Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical comparison of clinical results between the two treatment groups

From: The functional outcomes and complications of different reconstruction methods for Giant cell tumor of the distal radius: comparison of Osteoarticular allograft and three-dimensional-printed prosthesis

Measure

Osteoarticular allograft group (N = 15)

3D-printed prosthesis group (N = 15)

p-value

allograft vs prosthesis

Postoperative

 Extension (°)

38.3 (range 25~65)

61.7(range 20~85)

< 0.01

 Flexion (°)

26.3 (range 10~50)

45.0 (range 20~80)

0.02

 Supination (°)

55.0 (range 40~80)

60.0(range 25~85)

0.187

 Pronation (°)

52.0 (range 30~65)

54.7 (range 30~80)

0.683

 Mayo score

65.0 (range 55~75)

71.0 (40~85)

0.013

 MSTS score

71.2 (range 57.1~82.9)

81.7 (range 60~94.3)

0.01

 VAS score

1.2 (range 0~3)

1.3 (range 0~4)

0.806

 Grip strength (% of normal side) (%)

54.7 (range 42.5~70.3)

64.4 (range 31.9~100)

0.03

The variations before and after surgery

 Extension (°)

8.7 (range − 20~30)

29.7 (range 5~55)

< 0.01

 Flexion (°)

1.3 (rang −20~20)

12.0 (range 0~35)

0.02

 Supination (°)

22.0 (range 0~50)

24.0 (range 0~50)

0.624

 Pronation (°)

18.0 (range − 5~40)

20.7 (range 10~40)

0.635

 Mayo score

47.3 (rang 40~65)

51.7 (range 25~60)

0.03

 MSTS score

17.1 (range 5.7~28.6)

28.6 (range − 2.9~57.1)

< 0.01

 VAS score

4.3 (range 2~6)

4.2 (range 1~6)

0.870

 Grip strength (% of normal side) (%)

25.1 (range 10.0~47.4)

31.2 (range 11.4~81.6)

0.250