Change | Odds ratio for low patient reported satisfaction following CTR |
---|
Odds ratio | 95% CI | p |
---|
DASH d |
Unadjusted | 0. 93 | 0. 90–0. 96 | < 0. 001* |
+ Demographics a | 0. 93 | 0. 91–0. 96 | < 0. 001* |
+ Disability b | 0. 92 | 0. 89–0. 95 | < 0. 001* |
EQ 5D e |
Unadjusted | 0. 54 | 0. 43–0. 67 | < 0. 001* |
+ Demographics a | 0. 54 | 0. 43–0. 68 | < 0. 001* |
+ Disability c | 0. 53 | 0. 40–0. 69 | < 0. 001* |
- Multiple logistic regression analysis on the association of change in DASH and EQ-5D and low patient reported satisfaction 12 months postoperative
- *Denotes statistical significance
- aUnadjusted crude association on odds ratio for low patient reported satisfaction
- bAdjusted for age, gender, living alone and operation technique
- cAdjusted for age, gender, operation technique, living alone and preoperative variables (PCS, EQ-5D and distal motor latency)
- dThe effect of a 1- unit increase in DASH improvement
- eThe effect of a 0. 1- unit increase in Eq-5d improvement