Skip to main content

Table 2 Relationship between radiographic parameters and curve magnitude

From: Patterns of coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

 

Major curve 10–20°

mean (°) ± SD

(range)

n = 282

Major curve > 20–40°

mean (°) ± SD

(range)

n = 668

Major curve > 40°

mean (°) ± SD

(range)

n = 104

p-value^

Post-hoc pairwise comparison

 

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

  

PI

46.7 ± 10.5

(22.1–76.2)

47.6 ± 12.0

(15.8–97.2)

49.7 ± 13.0

(3.6–87.1)

0.076

 

PT

8.7 ± 8.2

(− 20.5–35.3)

9.0 ± 8.7

(− 17.6–44.4)

9.4 ± 9.5

(− 30.8–28.1)

0.744

 

SS

37.9 ± 8.4

(13.4–62.6)

38.6 ± 9.2

(11.4–69.3)

40.4 ± 9.5

(9.4–64.6)

0.070

 

PI-LL

−2.9 ± 11.5

(− 46.2–26.9)

−1.7 ± 12.3

(− 44.3–36.3)

−0.1 ± 14.1

(− 53.2–29.9)

0.086

 

LL

49.6 ± 11.8

(17.0–81.2)

49.3 ± 12.0

(13.7–90)

49.9 ± 13.2

(9.1–89.8)

0.913

 

TK

19.4 ± 10.1

(− 4.1–71.1)

17.8 ± 10.4

(− 24.7–69.3)

17.3 ± 12.3

(− 23.8–58.9)

0.029*

Group 3 vs 2: 1.000

Group 3 vs 1: 0.080

Group 2 vs 3: 0.065

Major curve

16.5 ± 2.5

(10.1–20.0)

27.8 ± 5.3

(20.1–40.0)

49.9 ± 8.8

(40.1–85.8)

< 0.001*

Group 3 vs 2: < 0.001*

Group 3 vs 1: < 0.001*

Group 2 vs 3: < 0.001*

  1. PI: pelvic incidence; PT: pelvic tilt; SS: sacral slope; LL: lumbar lordosis; TK: thoracic kyphosis; SD: standard deviation
  2. ^Kruskal-Wallis test
  3. *indicates statistically significant difference in mean rank thoracic kyphosis