Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of MacNab evaluation in two groups (n, %)

From: Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study

Groups

n

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

VDF group

45

19 (42.22)

21 (46.67)

4 (8.89)

1 (2.22)

VRF group

42

22 (52.38)

16 (38.10)

2 (4.76)

2 (4.76)

P value

0.62

  1. χ2 test was used to compare between each group. P < 0.05 represented significance. VDF visualized drilled foraminoplasty, VRF visualized reamed foraminoplasty
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us