Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison for OPLL

From: Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches

Reference

Type of study

No. of patients

Parameters measured

Key findings

Feng et al. (ref # [18])

Meta-analysis and systematic review

1050

Pre-operative and post-operative JOA scores with canal

Canal-occupying ratio < 50–60%

• no significant difference between anterior and posterior post-op JOA scores

Canal-occupying ratio > 50–60%

• anterior approach preferred due to significantly higher post-op JOA score (P < 0.05)

Ma et al. 2018 (ref # [45])

Meta-analysis and systematic review

292

JOA score

No significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative JOA scores in laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty

Lee et al. 2018 (ref # [46])

Retrospective series

83

Volume of OPLL using CT scans

Laminoplasty resulted in a mean annual growth rate of OPLL of about seven times of those who received laminectomy and fusion

Laminoplasty provided better mobility than laminectomy and fusion

Iwasaki et al. 2007 (ref # [47])

Retrospective clinical study

66

mJOA and recovery rate after laminoplasty

Those with spinal canal occupancy < 60% had a significantly better recovery rate after laminoplasty than those with spinal canal occupancy > 60%

Iwasaki et al. 2007 (ref #[48])

Retrospective clinical study

27

mJOA and recovery after anterior decompression vs laminoplasty

Excellent or good outcome proportions of the anterior approach were similar to the posterior approach

Anterior approach had fewer poor outcomes

Fujiyoshi et al. 2008 (ref # [49])

Non-randomized clinical trial

27

JOA scores before and one year after surgery after posterior decompression and mean recovery rate

K-line (−) patients are not suitable for laminoplasty due to posterior shift of the spinal cord

K-line (+) patients are more suitable for posterior approach

Chen et al. 2011 (ref # [50])

Retrospective clinical study

75

JOA score

ACCF is superior to laminoplasty for multi-level OPLL

ACDF vs laminectomy showed no significant difference in post-op JOA scores

Nayak et al. 2018 (ref # [51])

Meta-analysis

3963

5-year QALY

Laminoplasty had the highest 5-year QALYs gained compared to laminectomy and anterior approaches

Sun et al. 2018 (ref # [52])

Non-randomised clinical study

24

JOA scores

K-line status

OPLL > 6 mm

• K-line (−) had a better outcome than the K-line (+) group after anterior decompression

OPLL < 6 mm

• No difference in clinical outcomes of after anterior decompression

  1. ACCF Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion, ACDF Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, mJOA Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, OPLL Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, QALY Quality-adjusted life years