Skip to main content

Table 3 Complications between the two groups

From: Assessment of the efficacy of the far cortical locking technique in proximal humeral fractures: a comparison with the conventional bi-cortical locking technique

Variable

Bicortical locking group (n = 27)

Far cortical locking group (n = 18)

Overall complications (n, %)

9 (33.3%)

5 (27.8%)

Fracture collapse (%)

Metal failure (%)

Screw loosening (%)

Infection (%)

Peri-hardware fracture (%)

Stiffness at 1 year after surgery (%)

6 (22.2%)

4 (22.2%)

Avascular necrosis with screw penetration (%)

1 (3.7%)

Resorption or migration of the greater tuberosity (%)

2 (7.4%)

1 (5.6%)