Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical and Radiologic outcomes between the two groups

From: Assessment of the efficacy of the far cortical locking technique in proximal humeral fractures: a comparison with the conventional bi-cortical locking technique

Variable

Bicortical locking group (n = 27)

Far cortical locking group (n = 18)

p-value

Union at 12 weeks (%)

18 (66.7%)

17 (94.4%)

0.006

Neck-shaft angle

 Postoperative

135.9 ± 6.1

137.6 ± 12.9

0.267

 1 year later surgery

133.2 ± 6.7

136.4 ± 11.9

0.257

Paavolainen Classification

  

0.521

 Good (130° ± 10°)

24

17

 

 Fair (100° - 120°)

3

1

 

 Poor (< 100°)

0

0

 

ASES score (100)

79.2 ± 18.6

80.4 ± 14.8

0.845

Constant score (100)

73.3 ± 15.1

75.2 ± 12.2

0.629

Range of motion

 Forward elevation

122.8 ± 17.7

128.3 ± 16.8

0.296

 External rotation

30.0 ± 11.9

30.6 ± 11.7

0.878

 Internal rotation

T10

T11

0.576

  1. ASES American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons