Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with spine trauma and the adjacent disc degeneration

From: Association between non-traumatic vertebral fractures and adjacent discs degeneration: a cross-sectional study and literature review

Author

Year

Subjects

Age (averaged)

Design

Follow-up

Type of injury

Treatment

MRI Assessment

Kerttula [6]

2000

14

15.5 [8.8–20.8]

Retrospective study

3.8 Y

Wedge-type (14)

Conservative

Decrease in T2 signal intensity

Moller [20]

2007

20

12 [7–16]

Observational cohort study

40 Y

Stable (18), Denis type B (2)

Conservative

Oner classification Scheme [21]

Verlaan [22]

2013

20

42 [18–74]

Prospective trial

12 to 18 M

AO: A3 (20), A4 (1)

PS fixation

Pfirrmann classification [14]

Toyone [7]

2013

12

38 [14–59]

Prospective consecutive series

10 Y

AO: A3 (12)

PS fixation

Borenstein’s report (score: 0–3) [23]

Wang [8]

2013

26

39.6 [21–54]

Retrospective study

9–12 M

AO: A3 (26)

PS fixation

Pfirrmann classification [14]

Sander [9]

2014

27

37.5 [16–59]

Retrospective study

1 Y

AO: A1 (5), A2 (14), A3 (8)

PS fixation

Original classification (Grade 0–3)

Noriega [10]

2016

20

50.7 [45–56]

Retrospective study

32 M

AO: A1 (10), A3 (10)

IKP

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Descamps [11]

2019

93

54 [18–83]

Retrospective study

26.7 M

AO: A1 (54), A2 (5), A3 (34)

IKP

Radiograph UCLA Grading Scale [24]

  1. Numbers in the brackets indicate the range of age. Number in the parentheses indicates the number of subjects
  2. Y Years, M Months, PS fixation Pedicle screw fixation, AO AO classification [19], IKP Instrumented kyphoplasty
  3. OVF Osteoporotic vertebral fracture