Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of symptomatic patients prior to revision and asymptomatic patients prior to revision

From: Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures

  UTA (n = 98) CTA (n = 100)  
Month(s) postoperatively Symptomatic
(n = 65)
Asymptomatic
(n = 54)
Symptomatic
(n = 65)
Asymptomatic
(n = 54)
p-value
1 81.21 ± 12.91 84.80 ± 17.43 81.19 ± 13.20 86.31 ± 14.10 0.271
6 82.49 ± 14.08 85.25 ± 16.52 82.60 ± 12.12 87.42 ± 13.49 0.104
12 84.64 ± 13.12 86.30 ± 12.97 85.32 ± 14.81 86.20 ± 11.33 0.312
24 86.33 ± 15.67 87.61 ± 16.51 87.66 ± 15.32 88.16 ± 13.72 0.203
36 86.52 ± 13.30 88.52 ± 14.85 86.84 ± 13.76 88.57 ± 17.81 0.164
48 87.87 ± 12.72 87.37 ± 15.13 88.42 ± 16.34 89.34 ± 16.26 0.029*
60 86.15 ± 14.16 88.57 ± 15.16 88.64 ± 15.33 90.16 ± 16.79 0.031*
Final follow-up 86.61 ± 12.24 88.46 ± 14.36 88.68 ± 13.30 90.54 ± 15.02 0.026*
  1. *Statistically significant values. “p-value” representing the comparison of two groups of symptomatic patients; p < 0.05 for comparison of asymptomatic patients between groups and for comparison of asymptomatic and asymptomatic patients between groups. PFNA Proximal femoral nail anti-rotations, UTA Uncemented total hip arthroplasty, CTA Cemented total hip arthroplasty