Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of symptomatic patients prior to revision and asymptomatic patients prior to revision

From: Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures

 

UTA (n = 98)

CTA (n = 100)

 

Month(s) postoperatively

Symptomatic

(n = 65)

Asymptomatic

(n = 54)

Symptomatic

(n = 65)

Asymptomatic

(n = 54)

p-value

1

81.21 ± 12.91

84.80 ± 17.43

81.19 ± 13.20

86.31 ± 14.10

0.271

6

82.49 ± 14.08

85.25 ± 16.52

82.60 ± 12.12

87.42 ± 13.49

0.104

12

84.64 ± 13.12

86.30 ± 12.97

85.32 ± 14.81

86.20 ± 11.33

0.312

24

86.33 ± 15.67

87.61 ± 16.51

87.66 ± 15.32

88.16 ± 13.72

0.203

36

86.52 ± 13.30

88.52 ± 14.85

86.84 ± 13.76

88.57 ± 17.81

0.164

48

87.87 ± 12.72

87.37 ± 15.13

88.42 ± 16.34

89.34 ± 16.26

0.029*

60

86.15 ± 14.16

88.57 ± 15.16

88.64 ± 15.33

90.16 ± 16.79

0.031*

Final follow-up

86.61 ± 12.24

88.46 ± 14.36

88.68 ± 13.30

90.54 ± 15.02

0.026*

  1. *Statistically significant values. “p-value” representing the comparison of two groups of symptomatic patients; p < 0.05 for comparison of asymptomatic patients between groups and for comparison of asymptomatic and asymptomatic patients between groups. PFNA Proximal femoral nail anti-rotations, UTA Uncemented total hip arthroplasty, CTA Cemented total hip arthroplasty