Investigator&year | No. of cases | Follow-upFU duration, months | Operative time, min | Hospital stay, d | Macnab outcome grade | Comlication rate,% | Comlication details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Komp et al. [14], 2011 | 74 | 24 | 44 | – | subjective satisfaction 86.5% | 16.21%(12/74) | transient dysesthesia 5; |
urinary retention 2; | |||||||
dural tear 2; | |||||||
revision surgery 2 | |||||||
other 1; | |||||||
Eum et al. [24], 2016 | 58 | 13.8 | 68.9 | – | good-to-excellent 83% (25/30) | 19.0%(11/58) | dural tear 2 |
Postop headache 3 | |||||||
Transient leg numbness 2 | |||||||
Postop hematoma 1 | |||||||
Conversion to open surgery 3 | |||||||
Torudom et al. [25], 2016 | 30 | 24–36 | 98.3 | 3.16 | good-to-excellent 81.0% (47/58) | 9.6%(3/30) | transient paresthesia 2 |
Revision surgery 1 | |||||||
Kim et al. [26], 2017 | 48 | 7.75 | – | – | good-to-excellent 96% (46/48) | 12.5%(6/48) | Dural tear 3 |
Revision surgery 2 | |||||||
Conversion to open surgery 1 | |||||||
Lee et al. [27], 2018 | 213 | 26.45 | 105.3 | 2.45 | good-to-excellent 93.8% (200/213) (46/48) | 10.80%(23/213) | transient dysthesia12 |
motor weakness 3 | |||||||
dural tear 6 | |||||||
Reoperations 2 | |||||||
Present study | 47 | 13.6 | 116.4 | 2.6 | good-to-excellent 97.9% (46/47) | 10.6%(5/47) | Transient paresthesia 3 |
Dural tear 2 |