Table 5 Agreement between assessed parameters on plain x-ray
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 3 | Reader 4 | Reader 5 | Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tönnis Classification | 0 | 18 (45%) | 17 (42.5%) | 2 (5%) | 10 (25%) | 13 (32.5%) | 12 (30%) |
1 | 5 (12.5%) | 7 (17.5%) | 10 (25%) | 12 (30%) | 11 (27.5%) | 9 (22.5%) | |
2 | 3 (7.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 12 (30%) | 5 (12.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 6 (15%) | |
3 | 14 (35%) | 11 (27.5%) | 16 (40%) | 13 (32.5%) | 11 (27.5%) | 13 (32.5%) | |
Binary Classification | 0 | 24 (60%) | 23 (57.5%) | 20 (50%) | 24 (60%) | 22 (55%) | 22.6 (56.5%) |
1 | 16 (40%) | 17 (42.5%) | 20 (50%) | 16 (40%) | 18 (45%) | 17.4 (43.5%) | |
Tönnis Relation to Surgery | Preservation (n = 19) | 19 (100%) | 19 (100%) | 10 (52.63%) | 17 (89.47%) | 19 (100%) | 16.8 (88.42%) |
Replacement (n = 21) | 17 (80.95%) | 16 (76.19%) | 19 (90.48%) | 16 (76.19%) | 16 (76.19%) | 16.8 (80%) | |
36 (90%) | 35 (87.5%) | 29 (72.5%) | 33 (82.5%) | 35 (87.5%) | 33.6 (84%) | ||
Binary Relationship to Surgery | Preservation (n = 19) | 19 (100%) | 19 (100%) | 17 (89.47%) | 19 (100%) | 17 (89.47%) | 18.2 (45.5%) |
Replacement (n = 21) | 16 (76.19%) | 17 (80.95%) | 18 (85.71%) | 16 (76.19%) | 16 (76.19%) | 16.6 (41.5%) | |
35 (87.5%) | 36 (90%) | 35 (87.5%) | 35 (87.5%) | 33 (82.5%) | 34.8 (87%) |