Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of perioperative indicators between two groups

From: Comparison between minimally invasive deltoid-split and extended deltoid-split approach for proximal humeral fractures: a case-control study

Characteristic ORIF group MIPPO group p value
Fracture classification    0.829
 II 16 (31.37%) 18 (28.12%)  
 III 21 (41.18%) 30 (46.88%)  
 IV 14 (27.45%) 16 (25.00%)  
Medial support status    0.816
 Complete 29 (56.86%) 35 (54.69%)  
 Incomplete 22 (43.14%) 29 (45.31%)  
ASA score    0.501
 I 10 (19.61%) 16 (25.00%)  
 II 37 (72.55%) 40 (62.50%)  
 III 4 (7.84%) 8 (12.50%)  
Type of anesthesia    0.878
 BA 31 (60.78%) 38 (59.38%)  
 GA 20 (39.22%) 26 (40.62%)  
Fluoroscopy times 4.37 ± 0.72 7.27 ± 0.93 < 0.001
Surgical duration (minute) 62.94 ± 10.18 82.25 ± 12.36 < 0.001
VAS 6.33 ± 1.05 4.78 ± 1.16 < 0.001
Postoperative hospital stay (day) 5.14 ± 1.58 3.81 ± 1.08 < 0.001
  1. ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, BA Brachial plexus anesthesia, GA General anesthesia, VAS Visual Analogue Scale
  2. Bold and bold font represent P < 0.05