Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary estimates of outcome variables in the current study

From: Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Outcome

No. of studies

Heterogeneity I2a (%)

Pooled odds ratiob

Mean differencec

95% confidence interval (lower bound)

95% confidence interval (upper bound)

Operative time

4

99

NA

−5.81

−17.85

6.23

Grip strength

2

0

NA

1.99

−0.43

4.42

BCTQ-S score

3

92

NA

0.15

−0.04

0.35

BCTQ-F score

3

91

NA

0.17

−0.02

0.36

SW monofilament test score

2

0

NA

0.06

−0.09

0.21

2PD test score

3

35

NA

−0.16

−0.45

0.12

Satisfaction rate

2

0

NA

3.13

1.43

4.82

Key pinch strength

2

0

NA

0.79

0.27

1.32

Return to work

4

98

NA

−7.25

−14.31

−0.19

Complications

25

16

1.06

NA

0.69

1.64

Transient nerve injury

25

0

4.87

NA

1.37

17.25

Permanent nerve injury

25

29

1.93

NA

0.58

6.4

Scar-related complications

25

0

0.2

NA

0.07

0.59

Hematoma

25

0

1.60

NA

0.36

7.16

Wound infection

25

0

0.53

NA

0.15

1.97

Superficial palmar arch injury

25

NA

3.07

NA

0.12

76.48

Persistent symptoms

25

0

2.17

NA

0.85

5.55

Pillar pain

25

35

0.95

NA

0.32

2.82

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

25

0

0.40

NA

0.10

1.65

Tendon injury

25

NA

0.26

NA

0.01

6.50

  1. 2PD Two-point Discrimination, BCTQ-F Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale, BCTQ-S Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale, ECTR endoscopic carpal tunnel release, NA not applicable, OCTR open carpal tunnel release, SW Semmes-Weinstein
  2. aHeterogeneity test: I2 > 50%, random-effects analysis model; I2 < 50%, fixed-effects analysis model
  3. bIf odds ratio > 1, favors ECTR; if odds ratio < 1, favors OCTR
  4. cIf mean difference > 0, favors ECTR; if mean difference < 0, favors OCTR