Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis

From: Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Year

Region

Groups, sample sizes, and techniques

Follow-up interval

Outcomes

Agee et al. [28]

1992

US

OCTR (n = 65): conventional release

ECTR (n = 82): one-portal (2 cm)

1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 26 week(s)

Return of hand use for ADL, time to RTW, grip strength, pinch strength, lateral/key and pulp strength, SW monofilament test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, Tinel’s test, scar tenderness, radial and ulnar pillar tenderness, record of medication use, complications

Atroshi et al. [9]

2006

Sweden

OCTR (n = 65): 4 cm

ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm)

3, 6 weeks;

3, 12 months

Pain, time to RTW, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, SF-12, sensation, grip strength, key pinch strength, DL, quality of life, SW monofilament test, 2PD test, complications

Atroshi et al. [29]

2009

Sweden

OCTR (n = 63): 4 cm

ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm)

1, 5 year(s)

Operative time, satisfaction rating, symptom relief, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, pain score, complications

Atroshi et al. [25]

2015

Sweden

OCTR (n = 61): 4 cm

ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm)

1, 11–16 year(s)

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, pain score, numbness and tingling, satisfaction score, quick DASH, pain scale, complications

Aslani et al. [30]

2012

Iran

OCTR (n = 36): conventional release

OCTR (n = 28): mini-incision

ECTR (n = 32): two-portal (length NR)

4 weeks;

4 months

Numbness, nocturnal pain, wrist pain, weakness and stiffness, Tinel’s test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, EMG, NCV, strength to grasp, time to RTW and ADL, satisfaction rating, operative time, complications

Brown et al. [31]

1993

US

OCTR (n = 82): conventional release

ECTR (n = 78): two-portal (2 cm)

3, 6, 12 weeks

2PD test, SW monofilament test, APB strength, thenar atrophy, grip strength, key pinch strength, pain, numbness, paresthesia, weakness, Tinel’s test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, interstitial carpal tunnel pressure, satisfaction rating, time to RTW, rate of ADL impairment, ADL score, operative time, hospital cost, complications

Dumontier et al. [32]

1995

France

OCTR (n = 40): conventional release

ECTR (n = 56): two-portal (Chow [12])

2 weeks;

1, 3, 6 month(s)

Paresthesia, pain, time to RTW, grip strength, finger mobility, complications

Ejiri et al. [33]

2012

Japan

OCTR (n = 50): 3 cm vertical incision

ECTR (n = 50): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13])

1, 3 month(s)

Paresthesia, nighttime pain, impairment of ADL, APB-DL, SW monofilament test, 2PD test, grip strength, pinch strength, key pinch strength, complications

Erdmann [34]

1994

UK

OCTR (n = 52): NR (short length)

ECTR (n = 53): two-portal (Chow [12])

1, 2 week(s);

1, 3, 6 month(s);

1 year

Grip and pinch strength, time to normal grip strength, time to normal pinch strength, time to RTW, ADL, time to relief of symptoms, median nerve motor and sensory DL, VAS pain score, complications

Ferdinand and MacLean [35]

2002

UK

OCTR (n = 25): NR

ECTR (n = 25): one-portal

6, 12, 26 weeks;

13 months

VAS scores (numbness, pain, and paresthesia), ADL, return to full activities, time to RTW, thenar muscle strength, lateral pinch strength, grip strength, wrist and finger movement, 2PD test, Jebson score, operative time, satisfaction rating, complications

Gümüştaş et al. [36]

2015

Turkey

OCTR (n = 20): NR (Taleisnik [37])

ECTR (n = 21): two-portal (Chow [12])

6 months

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, median nerve motor DL, CMAP, SCV, sensory nerve action potential, complications

Jacobson and Rahme [38]

1996

Sweden

OCTR (n = 16): conventional release

ECTR (n = 16): two-portal (Chow [12])

2, 6, 24 weeks

Symptom relief, total number of analgesics, 2PD test, time to RTW, nerve conduction test, complications

Kang et al. [39]

2013

South Korea

OCTR (n = 52): mini-incision (1.5 cm)

ECTR (n = 52): one-portal (Agee et al. [28])

3 months

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, DASH, complications

Larsen et al. [40]

2013

Denmark

OCTR (n = 30): classic incision, 7 cm

OCTR (n = 30): short incision, 3 cm

ECTR (n = 30): one-portal (Menon [41])

1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 week(s)

VAS (pain), grip strength, range of motion, pillar pain, VAS (paresthesia), time to RTW, complications

Macdermid et al. [42]

2003

Canada

OCTR (n = 32): conventional release

ECTR (n = 91): two-portal (Chow [12])

1, 6, 12 week(s)

Time to RTW, McGill pain questionnaire, key pinch strength, tripod pinch strength, grip strength, symptom severity score (Likert score), sensory threshold, self-report scale, SF-36, complications

Mackenzie et al. [43]

2000

US

OCTR (n = 14): 2.5 cm palmar incision

ECTR (n = 22): one-portal (Agee et al. [28])

1, 2, 4 week(s)

Grip strength, pinch strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, complications

Martínez et al. [24]

2019

Spain

OCTR (n = 52): 1 cm mini-incision

ECTR (n = 35): one-portal (Menon [41])

1 week;

1, 6, 12 month(s)

Grip strength, pinch strength, VAS pain score, satisfaction questionnaire, complications

Michelotti et al. [44]

2014

US

OCTR (n = 25): 3 cm palmar incision

ECTR (n = 25): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 cm)

2, 4, 8, 12, 24 weeks

2PD test, SW monofilament test, thenar strength, grip strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, satisfaction rating, complications

Michelotti et al. [45]

2018

US

OCTR (n = 30): 3 cm palmar incision

ECTR (n = 30): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 to 2 cm)

2, 4, 8, 12, 24 weeks

VAS pain score, 2PD test, SW monofilament test, thenar strength, grip strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, satisfaction rating, complications

Oh et al. [46]

2017

South Korea

OCTR (n = 32): mini-incision (1.5 cm)

ECTR (n = 35): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 cm)

24 weeks

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, DASH, CSA, CSA-I, CSA-M, CSA-O, flattening ratio, complications

Rab et al. [47]

2006

Austria

OCTR (n = 10): two mini-incisions

ECTR (n = 10): two-portal (Chow [12])

2, 4, 6, 12 weeks; 6, 12 months

VAS pain score, grip strength, pinch strength, key pinch strength, ADL, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, 2PD, DL, NCV, complications

Saw et al. [48]

2003

UK

OCTR (n = 42): 2 cm palmar incision

ECTR (n = 43): one-portal (Agee et al. [28])

1, 3, 6, 12 week(s)

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, grip strength, VAS pain score, time to RTW, operation time, complications

Sennwald and Benedetti [49]

1995

Switzerland

OCTR (n = 22): Sennwald incision

ECTR (n = 25): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 2–3 cm)

4, 8, 12 weeks

Grip strength, key pinch strength, time to RTW, complications

Tian et al. [50]

2007

China

OCTR (n = 36): S-shaped incision

ECTR (n = 34): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13], 1 cm)

2 years

Symptom improvement, operation time, hospital stay time, time to RTW, 2PD test, grip strength, scar tenderness, complications

Trumble et al. [51]

2002

US

OCTR (n = 95): palmar incision (3 ~ 4 cm)

ECTR (n = 97): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1 cm)

2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, 2PD test, satisfaction rating, grip strength, pinch strength (key pinch, three-jaw), hand dexterity, time to RTW, thenar atrophy, strength of APB, complications

Wong et al. [52]

2003

Hong Kong

OCTR (n = 30): mini-incision

ECTR (n = 30): two-portal (Chow [12])

2, 4, 8, 16 weeks; 6, 12 months

VAS pain score, grip strength, pinch strength, 2PD test, operation time, symptom relief, incision length, complications

Zhang et al. [53]

2016

China

OCTR (n = 72): double small incision

OCTR (n = 65): standard incision (5–7 cm)

ECTR (n = 69): two-portal (Chow [12])

3 years

BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, patient satisfaction, VAS pain score, cylindrical strength, lateral strength, pinch strength, grip strength, time to RTW, 2PD test, SW monofilament test, hospital cost, complications

Zhao et al. [54]

2004

China

OCTR (n = 21): S-shaped incision

ECTR (n = 26): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13], 1 cm)

2 years

EMG, operation time, hospital stay time, 2PD test, time to RTW, complications

  1. 2PD Two-point Discrimination, ADL activities of daily living, APB abductor pollicis brevis, BCTQ-F Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale, BCTQ-S Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale, CMAP compound muscle action potential, CSA cross-sectional area, CSA-I inlet at the distal wrist crease level, CSA-M the middle of the tunnel at the level of the pisiform, CSA-O the tunnel outlet at the level of the hamate hook, DASH Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, DL distal latency, ECTR endoscopic carpal tunnel release, EMG electromyography, NCV nerve conduction velocity, NR not reported, OCTR open carpal tunnel release, RTW return to work, SCV sensory conduction velocity, SF-12 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, SW Semmes-Weinstein, UK United Kingdom, US United States, VAS Visual Analog Scale