Author | Year | Region | Groups, sample sizes, and techniques | Follow-up interval | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agee et al. [28] | 1992 | US | OCTR (n = 65): conventional release ECTR (n = 82): one-portal (2 cm) | 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 26 week(s) | Return of hand use for ADL, time to RTW, grip strength, pinch strength, lateral/key and pulp strength, SW monofilament test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, Tinel’s test, scar tenderness, radial and ulnar pillar tenderness, record of medication use, complications |
Atroshi et al. [9] | 2006 | Sweden | OCTR (n = 65): 4 cm ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm) | 3, 6 weeks; 3, 12 months | Pain, time to RTW, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, SF-12, sensation, grip strength, key pinch strength, DL, quality of life, SW monofilament test, 2PD test, complications |
Atroshi et al. [29] | 2009 | Sweden | OCTR (n = 63): 4 cm ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm) | 1, 5 year(s) | Operative time, satisfaction rating, symptom relief, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, pain score, complications |
Atroshi et al. [25] | 2015 | Sweden | OCTR (n = 61): 4 cm ECTR (n = 63): two-portal (1 cm) | 1, 11–16 year(s) | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, pain score, numbness and tingling, satisfaction score, quick DASH, pain scale, complications |
Aslani et al. [30] | 2012 | Iran | OCTR (n = 36): conventional release OCTR (n = 28): mini-incision ECTR (n = 32): two-portal (length NR) | 4 weeks; 4 months | Numbness, nocturnal pain, wrist pain, weakness and stiffness, Tinel’s test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, EMG, NCV, strength to grasp, time to RTW and ADL, satisfaction rating, operative time, complications |
Brown et al. [31] | 1993 | US | OCTR (n = 82): conventional release ECTR (n = 78): two-portal (2 cm) | 3, 6, 12 weeks | 2PD test, SW monofilament test, APB strength, thenar atrophy, grip strength, key pinch strength, pain, numbness, paresthesia, weakness, Tinel’s test, Phalen’s wrist flexion test, interstitial carpal tunnel pressure, satisfaction rating, time to RTW, rate of ADL impairment, ADL score, operative time, hospital cost, complications |
Dumontier et al. [32] | 1995 | France | OCTR (n = 40): conventional release ECTR (n = 56): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 2 weeks; 1, 3, 6 month(s) | Paresthesia, pain, time to RTW, grip strength, finger mobility, complications |
Ejiri et al. [33] | 2012 | Japan | OCTR (n = 50): 3 cm vertical incision ECTR (n = 50): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13]) | 1, 3 month(s) | Paresthesia, nighttime pain, impairment of ADL, APB-DL, SW monofilament test, 2PD test, grip strength, pinch strength, key pinch strength, complications |
Erdmann [34] | 1994 | UK | OCTR (n = 52): NR (short length) ECTR (n = 53): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 1, 2 week(s); 1, 3, 6 month(s); 1 year | Grip and pinch strength, time to normal grip strength, time to normal pinch strength, time to RTW, ADL, time to relief of symptoms, median nerve motor and sensory DL, VAS pain score, complications |
Ferdinand and MacLean [35] | 2002 | UK | OCTR (n = 25): NR ECTR (n = 25): one-portal | 6, 12, 26 weeks; 13 months | VAS scores (numbness, pain, and paresthesia), ADL, return to full activities, time to RTW, thenar muscle strength, lateral pinch strength, grip strength, wrist and finger movement, 2PD test, Jebson score, operative time, satisfaction rating, complications |
Gümüştaş et al. [36] | 2015 | Turkey | OCTR (n = 20): NR (Taleisnik [37]) ECTR (n = 21): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 6 months | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, median nerve motor DL, CMAP, SCV, sensory nerve action potential, complications |
Jacobson and Rahme [38] | 1996 | Sweden | OCTR (n = 16): conventional release ECTR (n = 16): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 2, 6, 24 weeks | Symptom relief, total number of analgesics, 2PD test, time to RTW, nerve conduction test, complications |
Kang et al. [39] | 2013 | South Korea | OCTR (n = 52): mini-incision (1.5 cm) ECTR (n = 52): one-portal (Agee et al. [28]) | 3 months | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, DASH, complications |
Larsen et al. [40] | 2013 | Denmark | OCTR (n = 30): classic incision, 7 cm OCTR (n = 30): short incision, 3 cm ECTR (n = 30): one-portal (Menon [41]) | 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 week(s) | VAS (pain), grip strength, range of motion, pillar pain, VAS (paresthesia), time to RTW, complications |
Macdermid et al. [42] | 2003 | Canada | OCTR (n = 32): conventional release ECTR (n = 91): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 1, 6, 12 week(s) | Time to RTW, McGill pain questionnaire, key pinch strength, tripod pinch strength, grip strength, symptom severity score (Likert score), sensory threshold, self-report scale, SF-36, complications |
Mackenzie et al. [43] | 2000 | US | OCTR (n = 14): 2.5 cm palmar incision ECTR (n = 22): one-portal (Agee et al. [28]) | 1, 2, 4 week(s) | Grip strength, pinch strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, complications |
MartÃnez et al. [24] | 2019 | Spain | OCTR (n = 52): 1 cm mini-incision ECTR (n = 35): one-portal (Menon [41]) | 1 week; 1, 6, 12 month(s) | Grip strength, pinch strength, VAS pain score, satisfaction questionnaire, complications |
Michelotti et al. [44] | 2014 | US | OCTR (n = 25): 3 cm palmar incision ECTR (n = 25): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 cm) | 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 weeks | 2PD test, SW monofilament test, thenar strength, grip strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, satisfaction rating, complications |
Michelotti et al. [45] | 2018 | US | OCTR (n = 30): 3 cm palmar incision ECTR (n = 30): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 to 2 cm) | 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 weeks | VAS pain score, 2PD test, SW monofilament test, thenar strength, grip strength, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, satisfaction rating, complications |
Oh et al. [46] | 2017 | South Korea | OCTR (n = 32): mini-incision (1.5 cm) ECTR (n = 35): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1.5 cm) | 24 weeks | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, DASH, CSA, CSA-I, CSA-M, CSA-O, flattening ratio, complications |
Rab et al. [47] | 2006 | Austria | OCTR (n = 10): two mini-incisions ECTR (n = 10): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 2, 4, 6, 12 weeks; 6, 12 months | VAS pain score, grip strength, pinch strength, key pinch strength, ADL, BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, 2PD, DL, NCV, complications |
Saw et al. [48] | 2003 | UK | OCTR (n = 42): 2 cm palmar incision ECTR (n = 43): one-portal (Agee et al. [28]) | 1, 3, 6, 12 week(s) | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, grip strength, VAS pain score, time to RTW, operation time, complications |
Sennwald and Benedetti [49] | 1995 | Switzerland | OCTR (n = 22): Sennwald incision ECTR (n = 25): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 2–3 cm) | 4, 8, 12 weeks | Grip strength, key pinch strength, time to RTW, complications |
Tian et al. [50] | 2007 | China | OCTR (n = 36): S-shaped incision ECTR (n = 34): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13], 1 cm) | 2 years | Symptom improvement, operation time, hospital stay time, time to RTW, 2PD test, grip strength, scar tenderness, complications |
Trumble et al. [51] | 2002 | US | OCTR (n = 95): palmar incision (3 ~ 4 cm) ECTR (n = 97): one-portal (Agee et al. [28], 1 cm) | 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, 2PD test, satisfaction rating, grip strength, pinch strength (key pinch, three-jaw), hand dexterity, time to RTW, thenar atrophy, strength of APB, complications |
Wong et al. [52] | 2003 | Hong Kong | OCTR (n = 30): mini-incision ECTR (n = 30): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 2, 4, 8, 16 weeks; 6, 12 months | VAS pain score, grip strength, pinch strength, 2PD test, operation time, symptom relief, incision length, complications |
Zhang et al. [53] | 2016 | China | OCTR (n = 72): double small incision OCTR (n = 65): standard incision (5–7 cm) ECTR (n = 69): two-portal (Chow [12]) | 3 years | BCTQ-S, BCTQ-F, patient satisfaction, VAS pain score, cylindrical strength, lateral strength, pinch strength, grip strength, time to RTW, 2PD test, SW monofilament test, hospital cost, complications |
Zhao et al. [54] | 2004 | China | OCTR (n = 21): S-shaped incision ECTR (n = 26): one-portal (Okutsu et al. [13], 1 cm) | 2 years | EMG, operation time, hospital stay time, 2PD test, time to RTW, complications |