Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies characteristics and patient demographic details for each study

From: The effect of posterior capsule repair in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year of publication

Country

Design

PC/WPC

PTHA/RTHA

Number of THA/Patients

Average age (years)

M/F

Model

Chiu FY et al

2000

Taiwan, China

Prospective randomized study

96/84

PTHA

180/152

G1,51 (25–84)

G2,54 (29–90)

G1(59/37)

G2(51/33)

Moore

Goldstein WM et al

2001

USA

retrospective study

500/500

PTHA

1000/1000

NR

NR

Gibson

Tsai SJ et al

2008

Taiwan, China

retrospective study

62 (50)/142 (131)

PTHA

204/181

G1,63.32 (35–90)

G2,58.55 (24–87)

G1(19/31)

G2(63/68)

standard posterolateral approach(a U-shaped capsulotomy)

White Jr. RE et al

2001

Mexico

cohort study

437/1078

PTHA

G1:437/437 G2:1078/1078

NR

NR

standard posterolateral approach

Pellicci PM et al. (the first author)

1998

USA

retrospective study

395/395

PTHA

790/790

NR

NR

posterolateral approach

Pellicci PM et al. (the second author)

1998

USA

retrospective study

124/160

PTHA

284/284

NR

NR

posterolateral approach

Suh KT et al

2004

Korea

cohort study

96/250

PTHA

G1:96/83

G:250/220

G1:53.3 ± 10.8

G2:53.5 ± 10.4

G1(52/31)

G2(149/71)

posterolateral approach

Yamaguchi T et al

2003

Japan

cohort study

13/16

PTHA

G1:13/13

G2:16/16

G1:64.3 (52–79) G2:66.8 (50–82)

G1:(2/11)

G2:(4/12)

NR

Tarasevicius S et al

2010

sweden

RCT

135/141

PTHA

276/269

G1:69 ± 8

G2:68 ± 9

G1(39/96)

G2(49/92)

NR