Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction-internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis based on 1050 individuals

Included studiesCases: MIPO/ORIFSex: male/femaleMean age (years): MIPO/ORIFFollow-up (months)Fracture type
Chiewchantanakit 2015 [21]12/1612/1652/62NS/NSNeer: 2,3
Fischer 2016 [20]30/3016/3457.6/60.622.8/20.7AO: A,B,C
Gao 2015 [16]21/1817/2270/7218.1/18.1Neer: 2,3
Kim 2019 [28]19/17NS/NS58.7/52.624/24Neer: 2
Lin 2014 [22]43/4328/5863/6112.6/13.1AO: A,B,C
Liu 2013 [17]47/5143/5572.8/49.918.1/18.1Neer: 3,4
Liu 2015 [10]39/5242/4960.2/61.724/24Neer: 2,3,4
Liu 2016 [25]33/4228/4750.3/52.114.2/14.2Neer: 2,3
Liu 2019 [15]45/7244/7362.2/60.1NS/NSNeer: 2,3,4
Röderer 2011 [26]46/6132/7567.6/6512/12AO: A,B,C
Shang 2013 [19]24/5419/5961.6/6033.8/33.8Neer: 2,3,4
Shen 2018 [23]20/2620/2670.4/70.916.8/16.8Neer: 2
Sohn 2017 [9]45/45NS/NS61/62.614.3/15Neer: 2,3,4
Wang 2012 [18]20/2014/2669.6/69.7NS/NSNeer: 2,3
Zhang 2018 [24]13/2014/1966.1/61.512.4/11.9Neer: 3
Zhao 2017 [27]17/1921/1564/64.310/10Neer: 2,3,4
  1. MIPO Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, ORIF Open reduction–internal fixation, NS Not stated