Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies reporting QoL in patients with KOA

From: Global management of patients with knee osteoarthritis begins with quality of life assessment: a systematic review

References

Country

Study design

QoL instrument

Total Sample Size

Control Population

KOA Patients

Mean age

Gender Distribution

Cuzdan, 2017 [11]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

85

25

60

65.79

Knee OA: 57 female; 3 male

Control: 13 female; 12 male

Elbaz, 2017 [12]

Israel

Prospective observational

SF-36

93

30

63

64.2

Knee OA: 41 female; 22 male

Control: 9 female; 21 male

Lee, 2017 [13]

USA

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

120

40

80

60.3

Knee OA: 61 female; 19 male

Control: NA

Rundell, 2017 [14]

USA

Prospective

EQ-5D

5155

4711

368

75.3

Knee OA: 272 female; 96 male

Control 3017 female; 1694 male

Wright, 2017 [15]

Australia

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

120

40

80

64

Knee OA: 44 female; 36 male

Araujo, 2016 [16]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

SF-12

93

 

93

60

Knee OA: 69 female; 24 male

Control: 24 female; 16 male

Bokaeian, 2016 [17]

Iran

Randomized clinical trial

WOMAC

28

 

28

52.9

Knee OA: 25 female; 2 male

Cho, 2016 [18]

Republic of Korea

Prospective cohort study

SF-36

681

  

71.9

Knee OA: 383 female; 298 male

Kaban, 2016 [19]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

63

21

42

56.86

All female

Gomes-Neto, 2016 [20]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

35

 

35

66.57

Knee OA: 29 female; 6 male

Khatib, 2016 [21]

Australia

Cross-Sectional

Tot. EQ (adjusted from EQ-5D-5L)

2809

 

2809

68

Knee OA: 1740 female; 1069 male

Kiadaliri, 2016 [22]

Sweden

Population based cohort study

EQ-5D

1501

744

402

71.5

Group 1 (reference group having neither knee pain nor radiographic or clinically-defined knee OA) 469 female; 275 male

Group 2 (knee pain with-out OA) 119 female; 50 male

Group 3 (kne epain with OA) 256 female; 146 male

Kiadaliri, 2016 [23]a

Sweden

Retrospective

EQ-5D

First stage 7402; Second stage 1527

 

The number of people diagnosis with knee OA is not specified

69.4

First stage 4604 female; 2798 male

Second stage 977 female; 550 male

Oishi, 2016 [24]

Japan

Cross-Sectional

KOOS

963

 

397

54.33

Total: 595 female; 368 male

Knee OA: 299 female; 98 male

Sarumathy, 2016 [25]

India

Prospective study

SF-36

74

 

74

51.7

Knee OA: 55 female; 19 male

Cavalcante, 2015 [26]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

WHOQOL

90

40

50

67

All female

Fang, 2015 [27]

Taiwan

Population based

study

SF-12

901

441

460

74.04

Total: 492 female; 409 male

Knee OA: 232 female; 209 male

Ferreira, 2015 [28]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

75

35

40

68.36

All female

Kawano, 2015 [29]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

93

 

93

61.2

Knee OA: 69 females; 24 male

Kim, 2015 [30]

Korea

Cross-Sectional

EQ-5D

2165

 

2165

67.73

Knee OA: 1458 female; 707 male

Lee, 2015 [31]

South Korea

Cross-Sectional

EQ-5D

7977

 

7977

61.5

Knee OA: 5448 female; 4064 male

Pang, 2015 [32]

China

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

466

 

466

56.56

Knee OA: 382 female; 84 male

Rakel, 2015 [33]

USA

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

100

25

75

56

Knee OA: 46 female; 29 male

Control: 15 female; 10 male

Reid, 2015 [34]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

SF-36

190

 

190

60.2

Knee OA: 132 female; 58 male

Tsonga, 2015 [35]

Greece

Longitudinal

SF-36

68

 

68

73

Knee OA: 57 female; 11 male

Visser, 2015 [36]

Netherlands

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

1262

1060

205

56

Total: 707 female; 578 male

Knee OA: 125 female; 80 male

Control: 583 female; 477 male

Alburquerque-garcía, 2015 [37]

Spain

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

36

18

18

85

All female

Alkan, 2014 [38]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

152

40

112

60

Knee OA: 85 female; 27 male

Control: 30 female 10 male

Forkel, 2014 [39]

Germany

Cross-Sectional

KOOS

22

 

22

47

Knee OA: 17 female; 6 male

Jahnke, 2014 [40]

Germany

Cross-Sectional

HAS

159

 

159

63.5

Knee OA: 75 female; 84 male

Marks, 2014 [41]

USA

Cross-Sectional

AIMS

21

 

21

70.8

All female

Pérez-Prieto, 2014 [42]

Spain

Prospective cohort study

SF-36

716

 

716

72

Knee OA: 421 female; 295 male

Reis, 2014 [43]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

WHOQOL

12

 

12

67.25

All female

Alentorn, 2013 [44]

Spain

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

391

 

391

70.7

Knee OA: 303 female; 89 male

Clement, 2013 [45]

UK

Cross-Sectional

SF-12

996

 

996

70.32

Knee OA: 545 female; 421 male

Vulcano, 2013 [46]

USA

Prospective cohort study

SF-36

4732

 

4732

66.88

Knee OA: 2881 female; 1851 male

Williams, 2013 [47]

UK

Cross-Sectional

EQ-5D

2456

 

2456

71.4

Knee OA: 1494 female; 962 male

Coleman, 2012 [48]

Australia

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

146

 

146

65

Knee OA: 109 female; 37 male

Gonçalves, 2012 [49]

Portugal

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

136

 

136

67.2

Knee OA: 94 female; 42 male

Lim, 2012 [50]

Philippine

Cross-Sectional

WOMAC

90

  

70.14

Knee OA: 68 female; 22 male

Elbaz, 2011 [51]

Israel

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

1487

 

1487

61.9

Knee OA: 950 female; 537 male

Gonçalves, 2011 [52]

Portugal

Cross-Sectional

KOOS

377

 

377

67.8

Knee OA: 282 females; 95 males

Norimatsu, 2011 [53]

Japan

Prospective population-based cohort study

Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM)

333

 

333

64.2

All female

Ozcakir, 2011 [54]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

NHP

100

 

100

59.5

Knee OA: 83 female; 17 male

Paker, 2011 [55]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

75

 

75

66.1

All female

Foroughi, 2010 [56]

Australia

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

17

 

17

66

All female

Jenkins, 2010 [57]

USA

Cross-Sectional

QLI-A

75

 

75

69

Knee OA: 57 female; 18 male

Kim, 2010 [58]

Korea

Prospective cohort study

WOMAC

504

 

504

70.2

Knee OA: 274 female; 230 male

Muraki, 2010 [59]

Japan

Cross-Sectional

SF-8

2126

 

2126

68.9

Knee OA: 1359 female; 767 male

Watanabe, 2010 [60]

Japan

Cross-Sectional

Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM)

18

 

18

67

All female

Yildiz, 2010 [61]

Turkey

Cross-Sectional

NHP

140

 

140

59.39

Knee OA: 104 females; 36 males

Debi, 2009 [62]

Israel

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

134

  

66.95

Knee OA: 85 females; 49 males

Imamura, 2008 [63]

Brazil

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

84

22

62

71.1

All female

Control 68.95

Liikavainio, 2008 [64]

Finland

Cross-Sectional

RAND-36

107

53

54

59

All male

Control 59.24

Wang, 2008 [65]

Germany

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

1009

 

1009

48.5

Knee OA: 620 female; 389 male

Nunez, 2007 [66]

Spain

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

100

 

100

71.2

Knee OA: 71 female; 29 male

Salaffi, 2005 [67]

Italy

Cross-Sectional

SF-36

264

 

KneeOA 108

65.7

Knee OA: 64 female; 44 male

Knee OA + Hip OA 51

Knee OA + Hip OA: 32 female; 19 male

Chacón, 2004 [68]

Venezuela

Cross-Sectional

AIMS

126

 

126

64

Knee OA: 106 female; 20 male

Lam, 2000 [69]

China

Cross-Sectional case–control study

COOP/WONCA

760

 

760

57.6

Knee OA: 538 female; 222 male

de Leeuw, 1998 [70]

UK

Prospective trial

Rosser Index Matrix

101

 

101

71.5

Knee OA: 62 female; 39 male

Donnell, 1998 [71]

France

Cross-Sectional

Rosser Index Matrix

221

 

221

No specified

Knee OA: 174 female; 47 male

Ries, 1995 [72]

USA

Cross-Sectional

AIMS

47

 

47

69.2

Knee OA: 44 female; 3 male

  1. SF-36/SF-12/SF-8 (n=34); EQ-5D (n=6); KOOS (n=3); AIMS(n=3); WOMAC(n=3); Rossser Index matrix (n=2); NHP (n=2);JKOM(n=2); WHOQOL(n=2);COOP/WONCA (n=1); HAS(n=1); RAND-36(n=1)
  2. aNot possible to add this article in gender calculation