Table 4 Comparison of the present study to studies of conventional stemmed prosthesis
Study | No of shoulders | Duration of follow up | Prosthesis | Mean CS | Age adjusted CS | Range of motion (in degrees) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flexion | Abduction | External rotation | |||||||||
A | P | A | P | A | P | ||||||
Raiss et.al (2012) | 46 | 10y | Aq | 61 ± 18.2 | 79 ± 43 | 133 ± 36.7 | 123 ± 41.6 | 35 ± 15.8 | |||
Deshmukh (2005) | 72 | 14 y ± 2.7 | N | Elevation-80 (58–100) | 109 (84- 124) | 25 (15–41) | |||||
Levineet.al (2012) | 27 | 17.2y(13–21) | N | – | – | Elevation- 141.89 (45-180) | 61 (30–90) | ||||
Sandow (2013) | 33 | 3y | G | 54.5 ± 4a 77 ± 6b | |||||||
Favard (2012) | 110 | 8y | Anatomic/ Reverse | 62.8 o 47.5 r 53.8 c | |||||||
Orfaly et al. (2003) | 65 | 4.3y(2–8) | G | Elevation 147 | 39 | ||||||
Denard (2013) | 50 | 115.5mo(60–211) | Aq | 58.4 ± 20.7 | 73.4 ± 23.9 | 128 ± 36 | 33 ± 24 | ||||
Current study | 21 | 5.9y(4.5–7.9) | E | 71.2 ±16.6 | 83 ± 15.9 | 149.5 ± 38.9 | 160.4 ± 32.3 | 138 ± 43.4 | 148.5 ± 38. | 46.1 ± 17.3 | 52.3 ± 14.3 |