Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Long-term results of the iBP elbow prosthesis: beware of destructive metallosis!

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Meijering
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Meijering
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Albright
1 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - A Dubory
4 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Meijering
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Albright
29 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - A Dubory
20 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Meijering
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Meijering
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12891-019-2781-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement