Skip to main content

Table 2 The 12-item appraisal scores for the RCTs

From: Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid usage in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis

Studies

Randomized adequatelya

Allocation concealed

Patient blinded

Care provider blinded

Outcome assessor blinded

Acceptable drop-out rateb

ITT Analysisc

Avoided selective reporting

Similar baseline

Similar or avoided cofactor

Patient compliance

Similar timing

Qualityd

Wang et al

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

High

Liang at al

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Roopa et al

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

High

Kim et al

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

High

Shi et al

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

High

Ou et al

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Moderate

  1. a: Only if the method of sequence made was explicitly introduced could get a ‘Yes’
  2. b: Drop-out rate < 20% could get a ‘Yes’, otherwise ‘No’
  3. c: ITT = intention-to-treat, only if all randomized participants were analyzed in the group they were allocated to could receive a ‘Yes’
  4. d: “Yes” items more than 7 means ‘High’; more than 4 but no more than 7 means ‘Moderate’; no more than 4 means ‘Low’