Skip to main content

Table 3 GRADE evidence profile of the effect of corticosteroid injection on pain

From: Corticosteroid injection for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Quality assessment

Summary of findings

Comparison

No. of trials

Limitations

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Publication bias

Participants

Effect size

(95% CI)a

GRADE

Corticosteroid injection

Comparator

Corticosteroid injection vs placebo injection

 Short term

4 [20, 24, 44, 46]

No serious limitations

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

132

123

-0.98

(−2.06, 0.11)f

Moderate

 Medium term

4 [20, 24, 44, 46]

No serious limitations

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

126

122

-0.86

(− 1.90, 0.19)f

Moderate

Corticosteroid injection vs physical therapy

 Short term

2 [25, 52]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisione

Undetected

49

50

-1.07

(−2.75, 0.60)f

Very low

 Medium term

3 [25, 37, 52]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

80

79

-0.74

(− 1.51, 0.03)f

Low

 Longer term

2 [25, 37]

Very serious limitationsd

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

52

51

0.00

(−0.39, 0.38)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs foot orthoses

 Short term

3 [40, 61, 64]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

92

99

−0.91

(−1.69, − 0.13)f

Low

 Medium term

3 [40, 61, 64]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

Serious indirectnessg

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

72

79

−0.17

(− 1.30, 0.97)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs dry needling

 Short term

2 [51, 59]

Very serious limitationsd

Very serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

81

81

−0.86

(−3.70, 1.97)f

Very low

 Longer term

2 [51, 59]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

81

81

1.45 (0.70, 2.19)f

Low

Corticosteroid injection vs extracorporeal shockwave therapy

 Short term

8 [29, 33, 34, 41, 45, 54, 56, 58]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

269

265

−0.32

(−0.77, 0.12)

Very low

 Medium term

10 [29, 30, 33, 34, 41, 45, 50, 54, 58, 63]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

354

354

−0.05

(−0.60, 0.49)

Very low

 Longer term

5 [30, 33, 34, 50, 58]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

202

211

0.45

(−0.09, 0.99)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs laser therapy

 Short term

2 [65, 66]

Very serious limitationsd

No serious inconsistency

Serious indirectnessg

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

50

44

−0.20

(−0.61, 0.20)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs autologous blood injection

 Short term

4 [22, 38, 42, 62]

Very serious limitationsd

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

Undetected

126

131

−0.56

(−0.86, − 0.26)

Low

 Medium term

4 [22, 38, 42, 62]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

126

131

−0.31

(−0.83, 0.21)

Very low

 Longer term

4 [22, 39, 42, 62]

Very serious limitationsd

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

128

134

−0.05

(−0.31, 0.21)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs platelet-rich plasma injection

 Short term

8 [21, 35, 36, 44, 49, 57, 58, 60]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

202

203

−0.16

(−0.70, 0.38)

Very low

 Medium term

7 [21, 35, 36, 44, 57, 58, 60]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisionc

Undetected

187

188

0.32

(−0.19, 0.83)

Very low

 Longer term

6 [21, 35, 36, 57, 58, 60]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

Serious indirectnessh

No serious imprecision

Undetected

162

163

0.61 (0.30, 1.06)

Very low

Corticosteroid injection vs botulinum toxin-A injection

 Short term

2 [27, 28]

Very serious limitationsd

Serious inconsistencyb

No serious indirectness

Serious imprecisione

Undetected

45

45

0.67

(−0.04, 1.38)

Very low

  1. Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval, GRADE Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation
  2. a Negative values indicate that the effect size (SMD) favours corticosteroid injection
  3. b Rated down 1 level for consistency as there was significant heterogeneity (i.e. I2 greater than 40%)
  4. c Rated down 1 level as the upper and lower boundaries of the confidence intervals represent different conclusions
  5. d All participants for this outcome were from trials rated at high risk of bias
  6. e The total sample for this outcome is less than 100
  7. f Rated up 1 level due to large effect size
  8. g The interventions differed between studies
  9. h Outcome measures were obtained at significantly different time points