Skip to main content

Table 2 Numbers of participants who improved or not their LC by more than 1° and reporting or not perceived improvement of GRC ≥ + 2 overall and in each therapy group

From: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle – Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner

 

Overall

N = 40 (%)

Predictive values of the test, % (95% CI)

Schroth exercises + Standard of care, n = 20

Standard of care, n = 20

True positive: Improved based on GRC ≥ 2 and LC change > MID of 10 (n, %)

12 (30%)

67 (41–86)

12 (60%)

0 (0%)

True negative: Not improved based on GRC < 2 and LC change ≤ MID of 10 (n, %)

16 (40%)

73 (49–88)

1 (5%)

15 (75%)

False positive: Improved based on GRC ≥ 2 but LC change ≤ MID of 10 (n, %)

6 (15%)

33 (14–59)

5 (25%)

1 (5%)

False negative: Not improved based on GRC < 2 but LC change > MID of 10 (n, %)

6 (15%)

27 (12–50)

2 (10%)

4 (20%)

  1. GRC Global Rating of Change, LC Largest Curve, MID Minimum Important Difference, n number of participants, 95% CI 95% confidence interval