Skip to main content

Table 1 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results

From: The effect of ultraviolet photofunctionalization of titanium instrumentation in lumbar fusion: a non-randomized controlled trial

Sample

Element

Pre-UV

Post-UV

Change ratio (%)

a) Test piece of pure titanium evaluated 3 months after production

 1

O1s

48

58

+20.8

C1s

22

7

-68.2

Ti2p

5

6

+20.0

N1s

11

11

0

Si2p

13

15

+15.4

P2p

0

0

0

Ca2p

0

0

0

 2

O1s

47

56

+19.1

C1s

25

9

-64.0

Ti2p

4

5

+25.0

N1s

9

12

+33.3

Si2p

13

15

+15.4

P2p

0

0

0

Ca2p

0

0

0

b) Test piece of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy evaluated 3 months after production

 1

O1s

49

62

+26.5

C1s

23

5

-78.3

Ti2p

3

4

+33.3

N1s

7

8

+14.3

Si2p

16

19

+18.8

P2p

0

0

0

Ca2p

0

0

0

 2

O1s

47

59

+25.5

C1s

25

7

-72.0

Ti2p

2

3

+50.0

N1s

10

10

0

Si2p

14

18

+28.6

P2p

0

0

0

Ca2p

0

0

0

c) Actual implants (PROSPACE®) used in lumbar fusion surgery, produced 1 year prior to surgery

 1

O1s

40.8

50.4

+23.5

C1s

24.8

9.2

-62.9

Ti2p

19.3

22.5

+16.6

N1s

10.1

11.5

+13.9

Si2p

3.2

4.1

+28.1

P2p

0.6

0.8

+33.3

Ca2p

1.1

1.4

+27.3

  1. C1s Energy peak position of carbon
  2. UV Ultraviolet photofunctionalization
  3. Carbon concentration = (The number of counts of carbon detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy)/(The number of all elements detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy)* 100
  4. Boldface: The change ratio of carbon