Table 1 Demographic data of the included patient cohort
From: Computed tomography for managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis
|  | CT [n / %] | No CT [n / %] | Pearsonsχ2 [Value / df] | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Â | 45 / 60.0 | 30 / 40.0 | Â | Â |
Gender | Female | 28 / 62.2 | 22 / 73.3 | 1.000 / 1 | 0.454 |
Male | 17 / 37.8 | 8 / 26.7 | |||
Cement | No | 19 / 42.2 | 10 / 34.5 | 0.443 / 1 | 0.627 |
Yes | 26 / 57.8 | 19 / 65.5 | |||
Prosthesis | Hemi-Prosthesis | 2 / 4.4 | 2 / 6.7 | 0.919 / 2 | 1.000 |
Full- Prosthesis | 41 / 91.1 | 27 / 90.0 | |||
Revision-Prosthesis | 2 / 4.4 | 1 / 3.3 | |||
ASA | 1 | 1 / 2.9 | – | 4.827 / 3 | 0.141 |
2 | 12 / 34.3 | 11 / 45.8 | |||
3 | 22 / 62.9 | 11 / 45.8 | |||
4 | – | 2 / 8.3 | |||
Operative Strategy | Cerclage | – | 2 / 6.7 | 6.838 / 3 | 0.056 |
Plate Fixation | 21 / 53.8 | 18 / 60.0 | |||
Exchange | 20 / 44.4 | 10 / 33.3 | |||
Intramedullary Nail | 4 / 8.9 | – | |||
Intraoperative | Fixed | 24 / 54.5 | 17 / 58.6 | 0.118 / 1 | 0.812 |
Loose | 20 / 45.5 | 12 / 41.4 | |||