Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data of the included patient cohort

From: Computed tomography for managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis

  CT [n / %] No CT [n / %] Pearsonsχ2 [Value / df] p-value
Total   45 / 60.0 30 / 40.0   
Gender Female 28 / 62.2 22 / 73.3 1.000 / 1 0.454
Male 17 / 37.8 8 / 26.7
Cement No 19 / 42.2 10 / 34.5 0.443 / 1 0.627
Yes 26 / 57.8 19 / 65.5
Prosthesis Hemi-Prosthesis 2 / 4.4 2 / 6.7 0.919 / 2 1.000
Full- Prosthesis 41 / 91.1 27 / 90.0
Revision-Prosthesis 2 / 4.4 1 / 3.3
ASA 1 1 / 2.9 4.827 / 3 0.141
2 12 / 34.3 11 / 45.8
3 22 / 62.9 11 / 45.8
4 2 / 8.3
Operative Strategy Cerclage 2 / 6.7 6.838 / 3 0.056
Plate Fixation 21 / 53.8 18 / 60.0
Exchange 20 / 44.4 10 / 33.3
Intramedullary Nail 4 / 8.9
Intraoperative Fixed 24 / 54.5 17 / 58.6 0.118 / 1 0.812
Loose 20 / 45.5 12 / 41.4
  1. Numbers (n) and percentage (%) are presented in the right column