Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple Comparisons. Post-Hoc Bonferroni analysis of multiple comparison for each ethnicity at each individual vertebral level was undergone to identify significance

From: A comparison of lumbar transverse pedicle angles between ethnic groups: a retrospective review

Multiple Comparisons
Lumbar Level Ethnicity Ethnicity Comparison Mean Difference SEM Significance 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
L1 TPA- Avg White Asian −.686680 .600579 1.000 − 2.30576 .93240
Hispanic .080972 .612868 1.000 −1.57124 1.73318
Black .510787 .612868 1.000 −1.14142 2.16300
Asian White .686680 .600579 1.000 −.93240 2.30576
Hispanic .767652 .465006 .613 −.48594 2.02125
Black 1.197467 .465006 .070 −.05613 2.45106
Hispanic White −.080972 .612868 1.000 −1.73318 1.57124
Asian −.767652 .465006 .613 −2.02125 .48594
Black .429815 .480773 1.000 −.86628 1.72591
Black White −.510787 .612868 1.000 −2.16300 1.14142
Asian −1.197467 .465006 .070 −2.45106 .05613
Hispanic −.429815 .480773 1.000 −1.72591 .86628
L2 TPA- Avg White Asian −1.274615 .645813 .308 −3.01524 .46600
Hispanic .918348 .659796 1.000 −.85996 2.69665
Black 1.835014a .659796 .039 .05671 3.61332
Asian White 1.274615 .645813 .308 −.46600 3.01524
Hispanic 2.192963a .514499 .000 .80627 3.57966
Black 3.109630a .514499 .000 1.72293 4.49633
Hispanic White −.918348 .659796 1.000 −2.69665 .85996
Asian −2.192963a .514499 .000 − 3.57966 −.80627
Black .916667 .531944 .529 −.51705 2.35038
Black White −1.835014a .659796 .039 − 3.61332 −.05671
Asian −3.109630a .514499 .000 − 4.49633 − 1.72293
Hispanic −.916667 .531944 .529 −2.35038 .51705
L3 TPA- Avg White Asian −1.678251 .663278 .078 −3.46594 .10944
Hispanic .260513 .677639 1.000 −1.56589 2.08691
Black 1.229957 .677639 .436 −.59644 3.05636
Asian White 1.678251 .663278 .078 −.10944 3.46594
Hispanic 1.938763a .528413 .002 .51457 3.36296
Black 2.908208a .528413 .000 1.48401 4.33241
Hispanic White −.260513 .677639 1.000 −2.08691 1.56589
Asian −1.938763a .528413 .002 − 3.36296 −.51457
Black .969444 .546330 .475 −.50305 2.44193
Black White −1.229957 .677639 .436 −3.05636 .59644
Asian −2.908208a .528413 .000 − 4.33241 − 1.48401
Hispanic −.969444 .546330 .475 −2.44193 .50305
L4 TPA- Avg White Asian .3619231 .8285395 1.000 −1.871189 2.595035
Hispanic .6011823 .8464783 1.000 −1.680279 2.882643
Black 1.9687749 .8464783 .133 −.312686 4.250236
Asian White −.3619231 .8285395 1.000 −2.595035 1.871189
Hispanic .2392593 .6600710 1.000 −1.539790 2.018308
Black 1.6068519 .6600710 .101 −.172197 3.385901
Hispanic White −.6011823 .8464783 1.000 −2.882643 1.680279
Asian −.2392593 .6600710 1.000 −2.018308 1.539790
Black 1.3675926 .6824526 .288 −.471780 3.206965
Black White −1.9687749 .8464783 .133 −4.250236 .312686
Asian −1.6068519 .6600710 .101 −3.385901 .172197
Hispanic −1.3675926 .6824526 .288 −3.206965 .471780
L5 TPA- Avg White Asian 1.507134 .886641 .555 −.88258 3.89684
Hispanic .977749 .905838 1.000 −1.46370 3.41920
Black 2.082194 .905838 .142 −.35926 4.52364
Asian White −1.507134 .886641 .555 −3.89684 .88258
Hispanic −.529385 .706359 1.000 −2.43319 1.37442
Black .575060 .706359 1.000 −1.32875 2.47887
Hispanic White −.977749 .905838 1.000 −3.41920 1.46370
Asian .529385 .706359 1.000 −1.37442 2.43319
Black 1.104444 .730310 .803 −.86392 3.07280
Black White −2.082194 .905838 .142 −4.52364 .35926
Asian −.575060 .706359 1.000 −2.47887 1.32875
Hispanic −1.104444 .730310 .803 −3.07280 .86392
  1. aThe mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level