Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple Comparisons. Post-Hoc Bonferroni analysis of multiple comparison for each ethnicity at each individual vertebral level was undergone to identify significance

From: A comparison of lumbar transverse pedicle angles between ethnic groups: a retrospective review

Multiple Comparisons

Lumbar Level

Ethnicity

Ethnicity Comparison

Mean Difference

SEM

Significance

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

L1 TPA- Avg

White

Asian

−.686680

.600579

1.000

− 2.30576

.93240

Hispanic

.080972

.612868

1.000

−1.57124

1.73318

Black

.510787

.612868

1.000

−1.14142

2.16300

Asian

White

.686680

.600579

1.000

−.93240

2.30576

Hispanic

.767652

.465006

.613

−.48594

2.02125

Black

1.197467

.465006

.070

−.05613

2.45106

Hispanic

White

−.080972

.612868

1.000

−1.73318

1.57124

Asian

−.767652

.465006

.613

−2.02125

.48594

Black

.429815

.480773

1.000

−.86628

1.72591

Black

White

−.510787

.612868

1.000

−2.16300

1.14142

Asian

−1.197467

.465006

.070

−2.45106

.05613

Hispanic

−.429815

.480773

1.000

−1.72591

.86628

L2 TPA- Avg

White

Asian

−1.274615

.645813

.308

−3.01524

.46600

Hispanic

.918348

.659796

1.000

−.85996

2.69665

Black

1.835014a

.659796

.039

.05671

3.61332

Asian

White

1.274615

.645813

.308

−.46600

3.01524

Hispanic

2.192963a

.514499

.000

.80627

3.57966

Black

3.109630a

.514499

.000

1.72293

4.49633

Hispanic

White

−.918348

.659796

1.000

−2.69665

.85996

Asian

−2.192963a

.514499

.000

− 3.57966

−.80627

Black

.916667

.531944

.529

−.51705

2.35038

Black

White

−1.835014a

.659796

.039

− 3.61332

−.05671

Asian

−3.109630a

.514499

.000

− 4.49633

− 1.72293

Hispanic

−.916667

.531944

.529

−2.35038

.51705

L3 TPA- Avg

White

Asian

−1.678251

.663278

.078

−3.46594

.10944

Hispanic

.260513

.677639

1.000

−1.56589

2.08691

Black

1.229957

.677639

.436

−.59644

3.05636

Asian

White

1.678251

.663278

.078

−.10944

3.46594

Hispanic

1.938763a

.528413

.002

.51457

3.36296

Black

2.908208a

.528413

.000

1.48401

4.33241

Hispanic

White

−.260513

.677639

1.000

−2.08691

1.56589

Asian

−1.938763a

.528413

.002

− 3.36296

−.51457

Black

.969444

.546330

.475

−.50305

2.44193

Black

White

−1.229957

.677639

.436

−3.05636

.59644

Asian

−2.908208a

.528413

.000

− 4.33241

− 1.48401

Hispanic

−.969444

.546330

.475

−2.44193

.50305

L4 TPA- Avg

White

Asian

.3619231

.8285395

1.000

−1.871189

2.595035

Hispanic

.6011823

.8464783

1.000

−1.680279

2.882643

Black

1.9687749

.8464783

.133

−.312686

4.250236

Asian

White

−.3619231

.8285395

1.000

−2.595035

1.871189

Hispanic

.2392593

.6600710

1.000

−1.539790

2.018308

Black

1.6068519

.6600710

.101

−.172197

3.385901

Hispanic

White

−.6011823

.8464783

1.000

−2.882643

1.680279

Asian

−.2392593

.6600710

1.000

−2.018308

1.539790

Black

1.3675926

.6824526

.288

−.471780

3.206965

Black

White

−1.9687749

.8464783

.133

−4.250236

.312686

Asian

−1.6068519

.6600710

.101

−3.385901

.172197

Hispanic

−1.3675926

.6824526

.288

−3.206965

.471780

L5 TPA- Avg

White

Asian

1.507134

.886641

.555

−.88258

3.89684

Hispanic

.977749

.905838

1.000

−1.46370

3.41920

Black

2.082194

.905838

.142

−.35926

4.52364

Asian

White

−1.507134

.886641

.555

−3.89684

.88258

Hispanic

−.529385

.706359

1.000

−2.43319

1.37442

Black

.575060

.706359

1.000

−1.32875

2.47887

Hispanic

White

−.977749

.905838

1.000

−3.41920

1.46370

Asian

.529385

.706359

1.000

−1.37442

2.43319

Black

1.104444

.730310

.803

−.86392

3.07280

Black

White

−2.082194

.905838

.142

−4.52364

.35926

Asian

−.575060

.706359

1.000

−2.47887

1.32875

Hispanic

−1.104444

.730310

.803

−3.07280

.86392

  1. aThe mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level