Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical evaluation of patients: preoperative data

From: Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study

Characteristics

ER

MR

LR

P value

No. of patients

31

78

24

 

Extension, °

36 ± 17

39 ± 19

42 ± 19

.430

Flexion, °

76 ± 23

80 ± 21

81 ± 23

.602

ROM, °

40 ± 27

41 ± 26

39 ± 30

.957

MEPS, points

66 ± 15

70 ± 12

67 ± 11

.342

 Excellent, n

2 (6)

6 (8)

1 (4)

.297

 Good, n

9 (29)

29 (37)

5 (21)

 Fair, n

15 (48)

34 (44)

15 (63)

 Poor, n

5 (16)

9 (12)

3 (13)

Pain VAS, points

1.7 ± 2.0

1.5 ± 1.9

1.6 ± 2.1

.870

Ulnar nerve symptoms (Dellon classification)

   

.541

 None, n

21 (68)

60 (77)

19 (79)

 Grade I, n

6 (19)

10 (13)

4 (17)

 Grade II, n

4 (13)

5 (6)

1 (4)

 Grade III, n

0 (0)

3 (4)

0 (0)

HO (Hastings and Graham classification)

   

.849

 None, n

8 (26)

17 (22)

6 (25)

 Grade IIA, n

14 (45)

34 (44)

9 (38)

 Grade IIC, n

4 (13)

14 (18)

4 (17)

 Grade III, n

5 (16)

13 (17)

5 (21)

  1. ER early release group, MR median release group, LR late release group, ROM range of motion, MEPS Mayo Elbow Performance Score, VAS visual analog scale
  2. Categorical variables are presented as number (%)
  3. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation