Study | Evaluation time | Differences between the two groups | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DAA group | ALA group | |||
Mayr 2009 [16] | POD 6 week | Hip flexion, extension range increased | Maximum internal rotation of the hip in stance increased exclusively | DAA resulted in faster recovery of function at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively. |
POD 12 week | Hip flexion at foot contact, maximum flexion in swing, ROM in sagittal and coronal planes, maximum adduction in stance | Hip flexion in foot contact, maximum flexion in swing, ROM in the transverse plane, maximum internal rotation in stance | ||
Lugade 2010 [17] | POD 6 W, 16 W | Greater asymmetry in the ALA group compared with DAA group. | Both groups recovered gait symmetry at 16 weeks postoperatively, but DAA group recovered faster than DAA group at 6 weeks postoperatively. | |
Pospischill 2010 [18] | POD 10 days, 12 week | Despite absence of statistical significance, hip extension range decreased more than in ALA group | No significant difference between the two groups; Patients after hip surgery adjusted their gait pattern to reduce the magnitude of loading on hip joint. | |
Queen 2011 [1] | POD 6 week | No difference in hip flexion at heel strike, peak hip flexion, peak hip abduction angle, or peak vertical ground reaction force | ||
Muller 2012 [19] | POD 12 week | No effect of the surgical approach on the gait patterns or foot progression angle | ||
Klausmeier 2010 [8] | POD 16 week | Better peak external rotation moment | No significant difference between the two groups | |
Paliery 2011 [22] | POD 4 week | Longer duration of swing phase, improved range of motion of hip, reduced adduction | Gait pattern after THA strictly dependent on the surgical access and mainly on the extent and location of the surgical damage. | |
POD 13 week | Better hip flexion, minor obliquity of pelvis | Better hip extension | ||
Varin 2013 [24] | POD 10 months | Peak hip abduction moment reduced more than ALA group | DAA group showed closer to normal sagittal plane kinematics at the hip than the ALA group. Factors other than surgical approach contributed more to difference between the two groups. | |
Wesseling 2016 [23] | POD 1 year | Hip Abduction moment reduced more than ALA group | Hip flexion moment reduced more than DAA group | No significant difference between the two groups; Patients after hip surgery adjusted their motion pattern to decrease the magnitude of loading on the hip joint. |
Queen 2014 [12] | POD 1 year | Decreased operative hip adduction moment | Increased adduction moment | No significant difference between the two groups |
Martin 2011 [20] | POD 1 year | Heel interval during walking was greater with DAA group | Difference in terms of unoperated leg, while there is no difference between the two groups | |
Kiss 2012 [21] | POD 1 year | Gait pattern was almost normal | Hip motion reduced, pelvic rotation increased, increased compensation of knee and hip motion of unoperated leg | DAA yielded better functional outcome compared with ALA |