Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Study | type | DAA group (N) | ALA group (N) | Evaluation time | Variables |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mayr 2009 [16] | RCT | 16 | 17 | Preop, POD 6 W, 12 W | Time-distance parameters, pelvic & hip kinetic and kinematic parameters |
Lugade 2010 [17] | CS | 12 | 11 | Preop, POD 6 W, 16 W | Symmetry index of time-distance parameters |
Wesseling 2016 [23] | CS | 23 | 8 | After 1 year | Time-distance parameters, hip kinetics & kinematic parameters |
Varin 2013 [24] | CS | 20 | 20 | After 10 months | Time-distance parameters, Hip, knee, ankle kinetic and kinematic parameters |
Pospischill 2010 [18] | RCT | 20 | 20 | POD 10 days, 12 W | Time-distance parameters, pelvic and hip kinetic and kinematics parameters, electromyographical evaluation |
Paliery 2011 [22] | RCT | 15 | 15 | POD 4 W, 13 W | Time-distance parameters, pelvic and hip kinetic and kinematic parameters, electromyographical evaluation, functional hip score |
Muller 2012 [19] | RCT | 15 | 15 | Preop, POD 12 W | Time-distance parameters, foot progression angle |
Queen 2011 [1] | RCT | 15 | 8 | Preop, POD 6 W | Time-distance parameters, hip kinetic and kinematic parameters, functional hip score |
Klausmeier 2010 [8] | CS | 12 | 11 | Preop, POD 6 W, 16 W | Time-distance parameters, hip kinetic and kinematic parameters, functional hip score |
Queen 2014 [12] | RCT | 11 | 12 | POD 1 year | Time-distance parameters, hip kinetic and kinematic parameters |
Martin 2011 [20] | CS | 42 | 41 | POD 1 year | Time-distance parameters, hip kinetic and kinematic parameters, functional hip score |
Kiss 2012 [21] | RCT | 40 | 40 | Preop, POD 12 W, POD 6 M, POD 1 year | Time-distance parameters, pelvis, hip, knee kinetic and kinematic parameters, functional hip score |