Skip to main content

Table 2 Pharmacological routine type preferences for hip and knee arthroplasty in Study 1 and Study 2

From: Comparing Australian orthopaedic surgeons’ reported use of thromboprophylaxis following arthroplasty in 2012 and 2017

 

Study 1

(N = 221)

Study 2

(N = 431)

Hip

n = 197 (%)

Knee

n = 216 (%)

Hip

n = 384 (%)

Knees

n = 427 (%)

Anticoagulant-only

144 (73.1)

161 (74.5)

155 (40.4)

176 (41.2)

Staged-supply

16 (8.1)

19 (8.8)

76 (19.8)

86 (20.1)

Risk-stratification

9 (4.6)

10 (4.6)

143 (37.2)

156 (36.5)

Routine patients: Aspirin only

High Risk patients: Anticoagulant only

2 (1.0)

2 (0.9)

103 (26.8)

116 (27.2)

Routine patients: Anticoagulant, then aspirin

High Risk patients: Extended anticoagulant therapy

1 (0.5)

1 (0.5)

24 (6.3)

28 (6.6)

Routine patients: Anticoagulant as inpatient only

High Risk patients: Extended anticoagulant therapy

6 (1.6)

6 (1.4)

Routine patients: Aspirin only

High Risk patients: Anticoagulant, then aspirin

1 (0.3)

1 (0.2)

 Protocol unclear, however employs anticoagulants and aspirin in a risk-stratification protocol.

6 (3.0)

7 (3.2)

9 (2.3)

5 (1.2)

Aspirin-only

25 (12.7)

23 (10.6)

7 (1.8)

6 (1.4)

Miscellaneousa

2 (0.5)

2 (0.5)

Thromboprophylaxis protocol not reported

3 (1.3)

3 (1.4)

1 (0.3)

1 (0.2)

  1. aNB: Miscellaneous incorporates surgeons whose reported practice did not fit into any of the other categories e.g. prescribing a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent other than aspirin