Skip to main content

Table 2 Additional information about the patients with implant failure after index procedure

From: “Revision of subtrochanteric femoral nonunions after intramedullary nailing with dynamic condylar screw”

Case number Age DCS Construction (holes) Additional plate Complication Therapie
3 58 14 No Infection Surgical debridement leaving the plate in situ in addition to antibiotic therapy
4 67 16 No Periimplant fracture four days after index procedure Add. Plate
5 52 8 No Persisting nonuinon without implant failure Add. Plate + bone grafting
10 72 14 Yes Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 1/2 Re-ORIF with double plate construction + bone grafting
11 87 14 Yes Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 2/3 Re-ORIF+ bone grafting
14 69 16 Yes Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 3/4 Re-ORIF+ bone grafting
21 59 16 No Implant failure; Plate broken between hole 7/8 Re-ORIF+ bone grafting
24 56 a No Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 8/9 Re-ORIF with double plate construction + bone grafting
26 50 12 Yes Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 3/4 Re-ORIF with double plate construction + bone grafting
31 68 14 Yes Implant failure; Screws broken distal 4 screws with implant loosenig Re-ORIF+ bone grafting
40 75 16 No Implant failure; Screw cut out THR
53 91 12 No Infection Surgical debridement leaving the plate in situ in addition to antibiotic therapy
54 58 14 Yes Implant failure; prox. Plate broken between hole 3/4 Re-ORIF with double plate construction
  1. aPlate type remained unknown do to lacking data