Skip to main content

Table 5 Pearson’s r correlation matrix for outcome variables in the intervention group

From: Does improvement towards a normal cervical sagittal configuration aid in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a 1- year randomized controlled trial

 

Δ cervical angle 0-10w

Δ cervical angle 10-1Y

Δ shoulder angle 0-10w

Δ shoulder angle 10w -1Y

Δ pain 0-10 W

−.2

P = .05

 

−.2

P = .015

 

Δ pain 10 W-1Y

 

−.1

P = .2

 

−.05

P = .3

Δ NDI 0-10w

−.24

P = .032

 

−.11

P = .196

 

Δ NDI 10 w-1Y

 

.2

P = .0

 

.07

P = .2

Δ algometric 0–10 w

.24

P = .033

 

.29

P = .012

 

Δ algometric 10w-1 Y

 

−.027

P = .4

 

−.002

P = .4

ROM flexion 0–10 w

.2

P = .028

 

.15

P = .1

 

ROM flexion 10w-1 Y

 

−.16

P = .1

 

−.007

P = .4

ΔROM extension 0–10 w

.34

P = .003

 

−.06

P = .3

 

ΔROM extension 10w-1 Y

 

.06

P = .3

 

.053

P = .3

ΔROM RT rotation 0–10 w

.25

P = .026

 

.14

P = .1

 

ΔROM RT rotation 10w-1 Y

 

−.11

P = .1

 

.033

P = .4

ΔROM left rotation 0–10 w

.4

P = .036

 

.03

P = .4

 

ΔROM rotation lt 10w-1 Y

 

−.1

P = .1

 

.013

P = .4

ΔROM RT lateral flex 0–10 w

.2

P = .020

 

.12

P = .1

 

ΔROM RT lateral flex 10w-1 Y

 

.14

P = .1

  

ΔROM left lateral flex 0–10 w

.2

P = .021

 

.05

P = .3

 

ΔROM left lateral flex 10w-1 Y

 

.04

P = .3

 

−.1

P = .2