Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision – experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Philipp Boelch
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Damron
6 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcel Betsch
11 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chien-Chun Chang
26 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Philipp Boelch
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Philipp Boelch
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-2314-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement