Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality of the included studies, based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project Tool

From: Bicycling participation in people with a lower limb amputation: a scoping review

Ref

Selection Bias

Study Design

Confounders

Blinding

Data Collection

Drop-Outs

Global Rating

Narang et al. (1984) [27]

0

0

+

Burger et al. (1997) [32]

0

0

0

Burger et al. (1997) [33]

0

Mead(2005) [38]

-

0

+

Kars et al. (2009) [36]

0

Childers et al. (2011) [28]

+

0

+

Childers et al. (2011) [29]

+

0

+

Sprunger et al. (2012) [37]

0

Bragaru et al. (2013) [35]

0

Koutny et al. (2013) [26]

0

+

Littman et al. (2014) [34]

+

0

Scheepers (2015) [39]

0

+

Dyer and Woolley (2017) [30]

+

+

+

Dyer (2017) [31]

+

0

+

0

+

0

Totals

       

weak(%)

10(71.4%)

11(79%)

12(86%)

12(86%)

12(86%)

6(43%)

13(93%)

moderate(%)

2(14.3%)

1(7%)

0

0

0

1(7%)

1(7%)

strong(%)

2(14.3%)

2(14%)

2(14%)

2(14%)

2(14%)

7(50%)

0

  1. “Ref”: reference, “+”: strong, “0”: moderate, “-”: weak. The total at the bottom of Table 1 represents how weak, moderate and strong each criterion is