Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression comparing the non-injured group and groups with lower or upper limb injury

From: Can anthropometric, body composition, and bone variables be considered risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in Brazilian military students?

Non-injured group vs. group with lower limb injury

B

SE

P

OR

(95% CI OR)

Lower

Upper

 Bone mass, left lower limb

−0.002

0.002

0.468

0.998

0.994

1.003

 Bone mass, right lower limb

−0.002

0.002

0.403

0.998

0.993

1.003

 Difference between the lower limbs

−0.005

0.011

0.673

0.995

0.975

1.017

 Fat mass, left lower limb

0.000

0.000

0.641

1.000

0.999

1.000

 Fat mass, right lower limb

0.000

0.000

0.599

1.000

0.999

1.000

 Difference between the lower limbs

−0.001

0.002

0.701

0.999

0.996

1.003

 Lean mass, left lower limb

0.000

0.000

0.394

1.000

1.000

1.000

 Lean mass, right lower limb

0.000

0.000

0.390

1.000

1.000

1.000

 Difference between the lower limbs

0.000

0.001

0.946

1.000

0.999

1.001

Non-injured group vs. group with upper limb injury

B

SE

P

OR

Lower

Upper

 Bone mass, left upper limb

0.005

0.009

0.607

1.005

0.987

1.023

 Bone mass, right upper limb

0.005

0.009

0.576

1.005

0.988

1.023

 Difference between the upper limbs

0.008

0.033

0.801

1.008

0.944

1.077

 Fat mass, left upper limb

−0.001

0.002

0.708

0.999

0.996

1.003

 Fat mass, right upper limb

−0.001

0.002

0.602

0.999

0.995

1.003

 Difference between the upper limbs

−0.002

0.005

0.723

0.998

0.990

1.007

 Lean mass, left upper limb

0.000

0.001

0.985

1.000

0.999

1.001

 Lean mass, right upper limb

0.000

0.001

0.991

1.000

0.999

1.001

 Difference between the upper limbs

0.000

0.002

0.979

1.000

0.996

1.004

  1. Abbreviations: B beta coefficient of logistic regression, SE standard error, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval