Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Logistic regression comparing the non-injured group and groups with lower or upper limb injury

From: Can anthropometric, body composition, and bone variables be considered risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in Brazilian military students?

Non-injured group vs. group with lower limb injury B SE P OR (95% CI OR)
Lower Upper
 Bone mass, left lower limb −0.002 0.002 0.468 0.998 0.994 1.003
 Bone mass, right lower limb −0.002 0.002 0.403 0.998 0.993 1.003
 Difference between the lower limbs −0.005 0.011 0.673 0.995 0.975 1.017
 Fat mass, left lower limb 0.000 0.000 0.641 1.000 0.999 1.000
 Fat mass, right lower limb 0.000 0.000 0.599 1.000 0.999 1.000
 Difference between the lower limbs −0.001 0.002 0.701 0.999 0.996 1.003
 Lean mass, left lower limb 0.000 0.000 0.394 1.000 1.000 1.000
 Lean mass, right lower limb 0.000 0.000 0.390 1.000 1.000 1.000
 Difference between the lower limbs 0.000 0.001 0.946 1.000 0.999 1.001
Non-injured group vs. group with upper limb injury B SE P OR Lower Upper
 Bone mass, left upper limb 0.005 0.009 0.607 1.005 0.987 1.023
 Bone mass, right upper limb 0.005 0.009 0.576 1.005 0.988 1.023
 Difference between the upper limbs 0.008 0.033 0.801 1.008 0.944 1.077
 Fat mass, left upper limb −0.001 0.002 0.708 0.999 0.996 1.003
 Fat mass, right upper limb −0.001 0.002 0.602 0.999 0.995 1.003
 Difference between the upper limbs −0.002 0.005 0.723 0.998 0.990 1.007
 Lean mass, left upper limb 0.000 0.001 0.985 1.000 0.999 1.001
 Lean mass, right upper limb 0.000 0.001 0.991 1.000 0.999 1.001
 Difference between the upper limbs 0.000 0.002 0.979 1.000 0.996 1.004
  1. Abbreviations: B beta coefficient of logistic regression, SE standard error, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval