Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis to investigate body composition variables as risk factors for general, traumatic, and overload injuries

From: Can anthropometric, body composition, and bone variables be considered risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in Brazilian military students?

  General (total) Traumatic Overload
Variables OR (95% CI OR) P OR (95% CI OR) P OR (95% CI OR) P
FM% 1.00 (0.92–1.09) 0.97 1.09 (0.97–1.23) 0.13 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.84
FM (kg) 1.00 (0.91–1.09) 0.91 1.06 (0.94–1.20) 0.30 0.95 (0.84–1.08) 0.50
BMC (kg) 1.04 (0.47–2.34) 0.91 1.21 (0.41–3.53) 0.71 0.88 (0.28–2.80) 0.84
FFM (kg) 1.00 (0.95–1.05) 0.85 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.46 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 0.63
BMD (g/cm2) 0.77 (0.03–19.2) 0.87 1.91 (0.02–154.6) 0.77 0.24 (0.00–22.3) 0.54
FM, upper limbs (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.81 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.52 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.63
FM, lower limbs (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.86 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.30 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.31
FM, trunk (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.98 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.33 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.72
FFM, upper limbs (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.85 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.85 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.52
FFM, lower limbs (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.75 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.50 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.77
FFM, trunk (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.90 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.37 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.52
BMC, upper limbs (g) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.94 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.87 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.87
BMC, lower limbs (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.85 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.64 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.79
BMC, trunk (g) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.82 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.75 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.88
  1. Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, %FM relative fat mass, FM fat mass, BMC bone mineral content, FFM fat-free mass, BMD bone mineral density, NS non-significant
Back to article page