Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparison of double-layer, double-row and suture bridge methods
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Hironori Kakoi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dennis Liem|
|3 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Lenschow|
|3 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Hironori Kakoi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Aug 2018||Editorially accepted|
|11 Sep 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12891-018-2244-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.