Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparison of double-layer, double-row and suture bridge methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hironori Kakoi
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dennis Liem
3 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Lenschow
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hironori Kakoi
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-2244-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement