Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies

Table 3 Complications and reoperation rates reported amongst included studies

Study	Procedure	Number of intra-op complications	Number of post-op complications (including instability)	Number of Revision surgeries	Number of recurrent instability
Cunningham G, 2016 [10]	Open	0%	11%	0%	0%
Cunningham G, 2016 [10]	Arthroscopic	0%	29%	4%	4%
Marion B, 2017 [13]	Open	0%	0%	0%	0%
Marion B, 2017 [13]	Arthroscopic	0%	6%	8%	3%
Kordasiewicz B, 2017 [16]	Open	13%	13%	8%	6%
Kordasiewicz B, 2017 [16]	Arthroscopic	8%	10%	13%	5%
Kordasiewicz B, 2018^a [19]	Open^a	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Kordasiewicz B, 2018^a [19]	Arthroscopic^a	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Metais P, 2016 [15]	Open	1%	13%	7%	2%
Metais P, 2016 [15]	Arthroscopic	0%	2%	4%	2%
Nourissat G, 2016 [14]	Open	0%	0%	0%	0%
Nourissat G, 2016 [14]	Arthroscopic	0%	0%	0%	0%
Russo A, 2017 [18]	Open	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Russo A, 2017 [18]	Arthroscopic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Zhu Y, 2017 [17]	Open	0%	0%	0%	0%
Zhu Y, 2017 [17]	Arthroscopic	0%	0%	0%	0%

^aKordasiewicz B, 2018 only included hardware complications reported and overlapping patient populations with Kordasiewicz B, 2017, therefore Korasiewicz B, 2018 was not included in any complication calculations

ISSN: 1471-2474