Skip to main content

Table 3 Complications and reoperation rates reported amongst included studies

From: Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies

Study Procedure Number of intra-op complications Number of post-op complications (including instability) Number of Revision surgeries Number of recurrent instability
Cunningham G, 2016 [10] Open 0% 11% 0% 0%
Arthroscopic 0% 29% 4% 4%
Marion B, 2017 [13] Open 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arthroscopic 0% 6% 8% 3%
Kordasiewicz B, 2017 [16] Open 13% 13% 8% 6%
Arthroscopic 8% 10% 13% 5%
Kordasiewicz B, 2018a [19] Opena N/A N/A N/A N/A
Arthroscopica N/A N/A N/A N/A
Metais P, 2016 [15] Open 1% 13% 7% 2%
Arthroscopic 0% 2% 4% 2%
Nourissat G, 2016 [14] Open 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arthroscopic 0% 0% 0% 0%
Russo A, 2017 [18] Open N/A N/A N/A N/A
Arthroscopic N/A N/A N/A N/A
Zhu Y, 2017 [17] Open 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arthroscopic 0% 0% 0% 0%
  1. aKordasiewicz B, 2018 only included hardware complications reported and overlapping patient populations with Kordasiewicz B, 2017, therefore Korasiewicz B, 2018 was not included in any complication calculations