Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bing Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ai-Min Wu
30 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Yung
27 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bing Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bing Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Jun 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-2136-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement