Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean differences from linear regression analysesa of selected pain and work related variables between Start Back risk groups (work related variables analyzed only on people in work, and higher scores represent worse problems)

From: Risk classification of patients referred to secondary care for low back pain

 

STarT Back risk group

 

Low risk

Medium risk

High risk

Pain

Intensity last week, 1–10 points

 Mean (SD)

3.8 (2.0)

5.1 (2.5)

5.7 (2.7)

 Difference (95% CI)

0.0 (reference)

1.2 (0.3–2.1)

1.9 (0.8–2.9)

Intensity past 3 months, 1–10 points

 Mean (SD)

6.0 (1.5)

6.9 (1.5)

7.9 (1.5)

 Difference (95% CI)

0.0 (reference)

1.0 (0.4–1.5)

1.9 (1.2–2.6)

Duration, weeks

 Median (IQR)

46 (20–52)

52 (33–52)

52 (47–52)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

8 (0.007)

8 (0.004)

Work

Missed days of work, passed 18 months

 Median (IQR)

11 (0–137)

30 (5–137)

137 (60–365)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

19 (0.14)

126 (0.001)

Heavy / monotoneous work, 1–10 points

 Median (IQR)

5 (3–7)

7 (5–8)

8 (6–9)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

2 (0.02)

3 (0.004)

Workable in six months, 1–10 points

 Median (IQR)

1 (0–5)

2 (0–5)

6 (2–9)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

1 (0.13)

5 (< 0.001)

Job satisfaction, 1–10 points

 Median (IQR)

2 (1–4)

2 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

0 (0.23)

1 (0.17)

Should not work (fear), 1–10 points

 Median (IQR)

4 (0–6)

5 (3–9)

10 (6–10)

 Difference (p-value)

0 (reference)

1 (0.01)

6 (< 0.001)

  1. aNon-normally distributed variables were analyzed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and results presented as differences in median values between risk groups