Skip to main content

Table 4 A priori hypotheses of the expected correlations and realized correlations between the KOOS subscales and the subscales of the WOMAC, SF-36 and Pain-NRS. The correlations are given as Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) values

From: Construct validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

Comparative subscales

Expected correlation

Realized correlation

KOOS Pain

WOMAC Pain

r = > 0.79 (very strong)

r = 0.81, supported

KOOS Symptoms

WOMAC Stiffness

r = 0.40 to 0.79 (moderate - strong)

r = 0.48, supported

KOOS ADL

WOMAC Physical function

r = > 0.79 (very strong)

r = 0.86, supported

KOOS Pain

SF-36 Bodily Pain

r = 0.60 to 0.79 (strong)

r = 0.69, supported

KOOS ADL

SF-36 Physical Functioning

r = > 0.79 (very strong)

r = 0.83, supported

KOOS Sport/Rec

SF-36 Physical Functioning

r = 0.60 to 0.79 (strong)

r = 0.67, supported

KOOS Pain

Knee Pain-NRS

r = > 0.79 (very strong)

r = 0.66, not supported

KOOS ADL

Knee Pain-NRS

r = 0.60 to 0.79 (strong)

r = 0.68, supported

KOOS QOL

Knee Pain-NRS

r = 0.40 to 0.59 (moderate)

r = 0.53, supported

  1. KOOS Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, SF-36 Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Pain-NRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale, ADL Activities of Daily Living, Sport/Rec Sport and Recreation Function, QOL Quality of Life