Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic factors of a favorable outcome following a supervised exercise program for soldiers with sub-acute and chronic low back pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Hancock
5 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Denegar
13 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno
26 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corey Simon
23 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marc Perron
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno
15 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corey Simon
1 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Hancock
31 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Marc Perron
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Hancock
18 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corey Simon
5 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Marc Perron
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
2 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-2022-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement