Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Kent
7 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
13 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ko Matsudaira
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Kent
3 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
27 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ko Matsudaira
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Kent
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ko Matsudaira
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
19 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ko Matsudaira
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
2 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-1986-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement