Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A case of bilateral revision total knee arthroplasty using distal femoral allograft–prosthesis composite and femoral head allografting at the tibial site with a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis: ten-year follow up

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naoki Nakano
25 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazunori Hino
29 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naoki Nakano
12 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazunori Hino
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazunori Hino
9 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
2 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-1981-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement