Table 6 Oncological and surgical results of treatment of pelvic metastases in current literature
Authors | Number of patients | Type of surgery | Complications | Mean follow-up (months) | Local recurrence | Survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruggieri et al. | 21 | 9 -curretage 12 en-bloc wide resection 3 - THR | 1 - urinary fistula | 28 | 30% | 15% - 66 months |
Yasko et al. | 14 | 14 - en bloc resection and THR | 1 -prosthesis dislocation | 53 | 0 | 56% - 60 months |
Nillson et al. | 32 | Intralesional and Harrington reconstruction | 2 - bleeding, 2 - dislocations, 1 – infection | range 0.5–106 | 0 | 40% - 11 months |
Marco et al. | 55 | 54 - protrusio cup with Harrington procedure 1 - hemipelvis prosthesis | 14 - early complications, 5 - fixation failure | 16 | 25% | median - 9 months |
Giurea et al. | 43 | 37 intralesional resections, 6 wide resections | 24% 50% | 19% 0 | median − 13 median - 16 | |
Guzik | 34 | 9 - Lumic prostheses, 16 - Harrington procedure, 9 - no reconstruction | 4 - infections, 2 - Lumic dislocations, 1 - implant loosening, 1 - nerve damage | 25 | 18% | 48.2% - 60 months |