Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of demographic data, sagittal parameters and postural patterns

From: How does the sagittal spinal balance of the scoliotic population deviate from the asymptomatic population?

Items

Normal adults (n = 126)

Scoliotic adults (n = 117)

P value

Age (y)

26.4 ± 3.7 (26.0, 27.1)

26.3 ± 4.7 (25.4, 27.1)

0.777

BMI (kg/m2)

22.0 ± 3.2 (21.4, 22.6)

22.2 ± 3.8 (21.5, 22.8)

0.731

Sagittal spinopelvic parameters (mean ± SD; 95%CI)

 Thoracic kyphosis (°)

39.1 ± 11.0 (37.1, 41.0)

37.0 ± 15.0 (34.2, 39.7)

0.214

 Lumbar lordosis (°)

54.0 ± 10.0 (52.3, 55.8)

54.6 ± 12.1 (52.4, 56.8)

0.703

 Sacral slope (°)

37.2 ± 6.7 (36.0, 38.3)

39.2 ± 8.4 (37.6, 40.7)

0.039*

 Pelvic incidence (°)

41.2 ± 7.1 (39.9, 42.4)

45.5 ± 10.0 (43.6, 47.3)

0.000*

 Pelvic tilt (°)

4.5 ± 2.4 (4.1, 4.9)

7.9 ± 7.5 (6.5, 9.3)

0.000*

 Spinosacral angle (°)

131.8 ± 6.9 (130.5, 133.0)

131.9 ± 8.9 (130.2, 133.5)

0.925

 Spinal tilt (°)

94.6 ± 3.9 (93.9, 95.3)

92.7 ± 4.2 (91.9, 93.5)

0.000*

Sagittal postural patterns (n, percent)

 Roussouly 1

31 (24.6%)

25 (21.4%)

0.665

 Roussouly 2

17 (13.5%)

20 (17.1%)

 Roussouly 3

62 (49.2%)

53 (45.3%)

 Roussouly 4

16 (12.7%)

19 (16.2%)

C7-subgroups (n, percent)

 C7-anterior

6 (4.8%)

29 (24.8%)

0.000#

 C7-posterior

120 (95.2%)

88 (75.2%)

  1. BMI stands for body mass index
  2. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05, unpaired student t test (two-tailed)
  3. #Statistically significant at P < 0.05, Pearson’s χ2 test (two-tailed)