Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison among perfect-C®, zero-P®, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jian Dong
22 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nishant Gupta
23 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jian Dong
17 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nishant Gupta
7 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jian Dong
24 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nishant Gupta
15 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
17 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sung Hyun Noh
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-1950-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement