This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A new classification of TKA periprosthetic femur fractures considering the implant type
- Johannes K. M. Fakler†1Email author,
- Cathleen Pönick†1,
- Melanie Edel1, 2,
- Robert Möbius1, 2,
- Alexander Giselher Brand1,
- Andreas Roth1,
- Christoph Josten1, 2 and
- Dirk Zajonz1, 2View ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 June 2017
Accepted: 16 November 2017
Published: 25 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amir Herman|
|16 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - oren ben lulu|
|15 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Johannes K. M. Fakler|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amir Herman|
|15 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Johannes K. M. Fakler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1855-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.