Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Examination of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies in patients treated arthroscopically for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder and implications for routine diagnostic joint exploration

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Oliva
12 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Kardouni
24 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gernot Lang
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gernot Lang
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gernot Lang
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1839-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement