Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Functional midterm follow-up comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Baqir Kareem
4 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Williamson
13 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - David Maximilian Spranz
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - David Maximilian Spranz
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - David Maximilian Spranz
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement