Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluations of vertebral marrow perfusion in a rat osteoporosis model

  • Jingqi Zhu1, 2,
  • Zuogang Xiong1,
  • Jiulong Zhang1,
  • Yuyou Qiu1,
  • Ting Hua1 and
  • Guangyu Tang1Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:446

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1800-1

Received: 8 June 2017

Accepted: 2 November 2017

Published: 14 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Jarraya
19 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nishant Gupta
15 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jingqi Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
2 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1800-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

Advertisement